[freenet-support] Re: [freenet-chat] Re: [Tech] Open-net

2006-08-09 Thread anonymous freenet user
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Ian Clarke wrote: >!!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!! >Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-18-665665722 > > >--Apple-Mail-18-665665722 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >Content-Type: text/plain; > charset=US-ASCII; > delsp=yes;

[freenet-support] Re: [freenet-chat] Re: [Tech] Open-net

2006-08-09 Thread anonymous freenet user
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >!!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!! >Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-18-665665722 > > >--Apple-Mail-18-665665722 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >Content-Type: text/plain; > charset=US-ASCII;

[freenet-support] From 0.5 to 0.7

2006-07-30 Thread Anonymous Freenet User
gt;--VywGB/WGlW4DM4P8 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >Content-Disposition: inline >Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > >On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 06:32:35AM -, Anonymous Freenet User wrote: >> On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland wrote: >> &

[freenet-support] Why is the main Download Freenet 0.7 when it's

2006-07-29 Thread Anonymous Freenet User
bably, but only after 0.7 has entered the beta phase. Ok, I should rephrase "until 0.7's stability equals or exceeds that of 0.5 *and* open-net is activated" >On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 09:54:31AM -, Anonymous Freenet User wrote: >>=20 >> I agree. I am wi

Re: [freenet-support] From 0.5 to 0.7

2006-07-29 Thread Anonymous Freenet User
sition: inline > > >--VywGB/WGlW4DM4P8 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >Content-Disposition: inline >Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > >On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 06:32:35AM -, Anonymous Freenet User wrote: >> On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Tosela

Re: [freenet-support] Why is the main Download Freenet 0.7 when it's

2006-07-29 Thread Anonymous Freenet User
or every >few days? Probably, but only after 0.7 has entered the beta phase. Ok, I should rephrase "until 0.7's stability equals or exceeds that of 0.5 *and* open-net is activated" >On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 09:54:31AM -, Anonymous Freenet User wrote: >>=20 >>

[freenet-support] Why is the main Download Freenet 0.7 when it's

2006-07-29 Thread Anonymous Freenet User
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Scruple Scruple wrote: > > Why is alpha software Freenet 0.7 being pushed onto users on the >download page? I think it better that the stable Freenet 0.5 be featured >as the preferred download. > > http://freenet.sourceforge.net/download.html > > Until Freenet 0.7 has open-

Re: [freenet-support] Why is the main Download Freenet 0.7 when it's

2006-07-29 Thread Anonymous Freenet User
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Scruple Scruple <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why is alpha software Freenet 0.7 being pushed onto users on the >download page? I think it better that the stable Freenet 0.5 be featured >as the preferred download. > > http://freenet.sourceforge.net/download.html > > Until Fr

Re: [freenet-support] From 0.5 to 0.7

2006-07-29 Thread Anonymous Freenet User
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >!!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!! >Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; > protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8" >Content-Disposition: inline personal note: I hate pgpmi

[freenet-support] From 0.5 to 0.7

2006-07-29 Thread Anonymous Freenet User
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland wrote: >!!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!! >Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; > protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8" >Content-Disposition: inline personal note: I hate pgpmime, inline may be o