Re: [freenet-support] Stable build 5055 crashes under Linux

2004-01-16 Thread Justin The Cynical
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:43:42 +0100 "Niklas Bergh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have checked to code. The file property that is used is 'last > modified time'. Can you verify that your touch modified this property > on the fields. > > I have now committed code to unstable which gives a more info

Re: [freenet-support] Stable build 5055 crashes under Linux

2004-01-15 Thread Justin The Cynical
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:00:11 +0100 "Niklas Bergh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yup. This means that the newest item in your datastore has a timestamp > that is larger than what your current system clock says the time is. > > Have you modified the clock on the machine or similar recently? > > I r

[freenet-support] Stable build 5055 crashes under Linux

2004-01-14 Thread Justin The Cynical
*sigh* I got the message about the new build and the reports that it's faster than the older builds. Yippie! So, I run update.sh, delete the old freenet.log, touch it, and start the following command as nobody: sh start-freenet.sh ; tail -f ./freenet.log And here is what I find in my log: Jan

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet under Linux issues

2003-12-12 Thread Justin The Cynical
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:49:53 +0100 "Niklas Bergh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Does the link take you to an URL which seems right? > > > > It doesn't show me anything but that word, no links or URL's. > > Bah.. I didn't ask about the page.. I asked about the URL (it can > usually be seen in

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet under Linux issues

2003-12-11 Thread Justin The Cynical
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 10:54:24 +0100 "Niklas Bergh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Also, when I try clicking on Spread Freenet, I get a blank > > page that says nothing more than 'Error'. ?? > > > > Justin > > Does the link take you to an URL which seems right? It doesn't show me anything but t

[freenet-support] 5049 crash under Linux WAS: Freenet under Linux issues

2003-12-07 Thread Justin The Cynical
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 23:09:03 - "Pete" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It sounds as though your node is running just fine, it's actually the > network that's fscked atm, there is currently a 'lot' of work going on > aimed at solving the issues you are encountering (check the devl list > for more de

[freenet-support] Freenet under Linux issues

2003-12-07 Thread Justin The Cynical
I've done some digging on the list and the web site and I can not find any reason for this to be happening. Freenet build 5048 set for a perm node Sun Java j2re1.4.1_06 Linux kernel 2.2.25 The machine is running a firewall script, but the freenet node port is higher than what the firewall worries