Dear Supporters, dear Dennis.
On Fri Nov 14 20:50:36 UTC 2008Dennis Nezic asked me:
> Out of curiosity, what kinds of things were you looking to do via thecommand
> line?
Well, I'm using a quite old notebook with a harddisc of 30 GB in it and - more
important - with a no more than 512 MB RAM
Dear Supporters, dear Dennis.
On Fri Nov 14 20:50:36 UTC 2008Dennis Nezic asked me:
> Out of curiosity, what kinds of things were you looking to do via thecommand
> line?
Well, I'm using a quite old notebook with a harddisc of 30 GB in it and - more
important - with a no more than 512 MB RAM
Dear Supporters,
I am a total newbie in freenet. Every time I start freenet I get the alert that
my node lies behind a NAT-device or a Firewall and that I should forward my
port-Number 11833. After some discovery-attempts in the administration tool of
my router I found out that there is actuall
Dear Supporters,
I am a total newbie in freenet. Every time I start freenet I get the alert that
my node lies behind a NAT-device or a Firewall and that I should forward my
port-Number 11833. After some discovery-attempts in the administration tool of
my router I found out that there is actuall
Dear Supporters,
the question I have sent to you some hours ago is obsolete. I have found the
button to start it again. Freenet is running properly. Now I should try to find
some "friends".
But still I don't know how to operate it from the command line (bash or dash).
Thanks.
--
Dear Supporters,
the question I have sent to you some hours ago is obsolete. I have found the
button to start it again. Freenet is running properly. Now I should try to find
some "friends".
But still I don't know how to operate it from the command line (bash or dash).
Thanks.
_
Neither client or server has to be ssl aware.
Markus
>From: "Toad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Ahh, okay. As long as it doesn't need the clients to be ssl aware.
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gm
al (inetd-startable) or remote servers. The concept is
that having non-SSL aware daemons running on your system you can easily set
them up to communicate with clients over secure SSL channels.
Would ssh port forwarding be better method?
Markus
___
S
> S writes:
>
> > On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 10:31:01 +0300
> > "Markus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Ouch, typo in Fuqids configuration (wrong port). Now it doesn't say
that
> >> node is overloaded or down, but I still can't get
stunnel -O r:TCP_NODELAY=1 -c -d 8481 -r my.server.domainname:8841
Fuqid:
unencrypted connections work
IP: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx port: 8481
encrypted connections fail
IP: 192.168.1.1 port: 8841
Markus
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ouch, typo in Fuqids configuration (wrong port). Now it doesn't say that
node is overloaded or down, but I still can't get it to download anything
through stunnel, logs say "Fatal error in download thread: EFCPError: recv
failed: 10054".
Markus
> Hi
> I'm al
g on WinXP)
and my nodes fcp-port, Fuqid tells me that my node is overloaded or down
(which it isn't, I am connected to it with browser right now). I have triple
checked my stunnel scripts and everything should be ok. Could it like
http://www.stunnel.org/faq/troubleshooting.html#ToC17? Any
12 matches
Mail list logo