Am Samstag, 7. Januar 2006 19:56 schrieb danilo salieri:
> Dear Freenet supporters,
> after a crash my Freenet (on Win XP SP2) doesn't start anymore but
> keeps telling 'Freenet is starting...please wait'. I tried reinstalling
> it (saving the datastore) and reseeding but nothing happens, it seems
> If everything else is the same, a change in IP address shouldn't
> matter. That's what ARKs are for.
ARKs are not being used anymore - they were of no use :-)
good byte
pgpjj0PvusxyK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@f
> > Unfortunately, because of the absurd way in which the Windows VMM
> > allocates memory, the more physical RAM you have, the more swap you
> > must add. (About 1.5x physical RAM is a typical value for the minimum
> > pagefile size.) Having less swap than physical memory is very bad
> > because W
Am Samstag, 7. Januar 2006 19:56 schrieb danilo salieri:
> Dear Freenet supporters,
> after a crash my Freenet (on Win XP SP2) doesn't start anymore but
> keeps telling 'Freenet is starting...please wait'. I tried reinstalling
> it (saving the datastore) and reseeding but nothing happens, it seems
> I checked on that before posting to the list, and the module is only
> valid in the OUTPUT chain. Since Freenet sends data both ways it's not
> much use for this.
I use this "-m owner" match, it works well and is sufficient. There is no
point in limiting the input rate (well, at least in most s
On Friday 21 May 2004 22:27, Toad wrote:
> > STUN is used to determine whether you are behind NAT. If you are then you
> > need a third party to start connections to others behind NAT. The third
> > party need not be a single server but can be a network of
> > communicating servers (such as all fre
On Sunday 06 June 2004 18:51, Robert Greenage wrote:
> I received the following "Alert" while I was in the process of d/l one
> image that was part of a larger file. I was connected to freenet at the
> time. Any thoughts?
>
>
> The connection was refused when attempting to contact 127.0.0.1:
On Wednesday 09 June 2004 01:26, Weiliang Zhang wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm trying to access running on a remote machine through the web
> interface, so I modified the following line in the freenet.conf on the
> remote machine:
>
> fcpHosts=127.0.0.1,ip_address_of_my_machine
>
> Is that all I need t
>>>I'm trying to access running on a remote machine through the web
>>>interface, so I modified the following line in the freenet.conf on the
>>>remote machine:
>>>
>>>fcpHosts=127.0.0.1,ip_address_of_my_machine
>>>
>>>Is that all I need to do? It didn't work for me... :<
>>
>>That line is only for
Am Sonntag, 11. Juli 2004 15:50 schrieb rensinghoff:
> Thank you soo much for your help.. I LOVE OPEN SOURCE PEOPLE !!!
another free hint: you posted your user-id along with your password.
you should now change the password as soon as possible :-)
good byte
pgpdmkaNh1pAY.pgp
Description: signat
Am Sonntag, 1. August 2004 07:58 schrieb Nick Tarleton:
> I run Freenet stable on Windows XP. Whenever I log in, the Freenet
> systray application loads and starts Freenet. This is annoying, to say
> the least, because I'm not connected to the Internet most of the time.
> I can't find what is telli
Am Mittwoch, 4. August 2004 02:01 schrieb Scott Call:
> I get the following when I run start-freenet under mandrake 10 (log
> level debug):
> ...
Please, leave LogLevel at "Normal" or "Minor". LogLevel=debug will rather
make your node inoperatable, because of the vast amount of messages it
spits
Am Mittwoch, 4. August 2004 06:33 schrieb Mike Z:
> Hrm. To answer myself, I changed the value in FLaunch.ini for JavaMem
> from default to 192M. This program is currently using up 160MB of
> RAM...is that normal?
Well, it is a recent problem with the size of the seednodes.ref file.
You solved it
Am Mittwoch, 4. August 2004 13:45 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Hi,
> i changed the storesize in freenet.ini while running Freenet. When
> Freenet checked the file at the next time, it generated the following
> error message:
>
>
> 04.08.2004 13:36:02 (freenet.node.NodeConfigUpdater, YThread-59,
> E
Kendy Kutzner wrote:
> On 2004-08-04T14:50:52+0200, Zenon Panoussis wrote:
> > Traffic
> > analysis might help me figure who made a request and who served
> > it, but I still have to break encryption before I can figure
> > which file that request concerned.
>
> That is not entirely true. The files
Am Mittwoch, 4. August 2004 19:13 schrieb Manfred Huber:
> "Yes, but that is not fatal to the running node. It just means you have
> to stop and restart your node make this change."
>
> So what's the place to report non-fatal bugs and observations?
This is not really a bug, it's just not implement
Am Sonntag, 8. August 2004 13:48 schrieb Anonymous:
> ...
> yes, disk is in full thrash.. cpu maxed. other processes grinding to a
> halt.
> ...
> 64mb (best this mb will do)
> ...
Sorry to say that, but just forget this for now.
My node is P1/200 with 128MB of RAM (Gentoo Linux) and i had to cho
Am Dienstag, 10. August 2004 21:41 schrieb Steve:
> Can it hurt the network if I make my datastore too big?
short answer: No!
long answer: The store fills up when your node serves requests from others
and you (the user). If a requested key is already in the store, your node
just sends this and
sorry, messed up the last mail a bit, but the text is valid!
good byte
pgpkft2zi46m6.pgp
Description: signature
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org
Am Dienstag, 10. August 2004 20:23 schrieb Ralph Towner:
> Can you please help me. For years I've never had problems to connect
> to freenet, but since some days ago I can't anymore. What could be the
> problem? I include my logfile.
> Thanks!
The "seednodes.ref" file is quite big nowadays. that
Am Mittwoch, 11. August 2004 00:55 schrieb Michael Kuijn:
> On Tuesday 10 August 2004 21:41, Steve wrote:
> > Can it hurt the network if I make my datastore too big?
>
> Not really, but enlarging your datastore all the time will prevent
> specialisation. This isn't real bad, but specialisation impr
Am Mittwoch, 11. August 2004 01:06 schrieb Derek Ferguson:
> Hmmm. Am I wrong to think there probably is an optimal store size for
> each node?
Sorry, yes.
> My thinking is that as the store grows, the node draws more requests,
> which at some point will exceed the node's ability to service them a
Am Saturday, 14. August 2004 12:42 schrieb Garb:
> ...
> I am running Freenet with "do announce", which I figure has the purpose
> of telling the world that I exist and would like to be added to other
> peoples list of nodes. At the same time I assume that I am building up
> my own internal list of
23 matches
Mail list logo
