[freenet-support] Interesting observations regarding performance

2004-02-18 Thread Troed Sngberg
Hi all, I think some will find this interesting. I've run Freenet on a Duron 900 with 512Mb ram, Windows 2000, for quite some time. The javaw process has consumed all available CPU, and the computer has been quite sluggish due to Freenet. I've also seen very low transfer speeds in FUQID

Re: [freenet-support] Interesting observations regarding performance

2004-02-18 Thread Toad
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 12:36:01PM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote: Hi all, I think some will find this interesting. I've run Freenet on a Duron 900 with 512Mb ram, Windows 2000, for quite some time. The javaw process has consumed all available CPU, and the computer has been quite

Re: [freenet-support] Interesting observations regarding performance

2004-02-18 Thread Victor Denisov
I've run Freenet on a Duron 900 with 512Mb ram, Windows 2000, for quite some time. The javaw process has consumed all available CPU, and the computer has been quite sluggish due to Freenet. I've also seen very low transfer speeds in FUQID (easiest to measure with, I think) - around 1-2kb/s

Re: [freenet-support] Interesting observations regarding performance

2004-02-18 Thread Troed Sngberg
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:42:48 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Memory usage on both? Roughly the same at ~150Mb (javaw process) Knock down the xferrate a bit from 11kb/s, it dropped a while after I sent that mess (I have no good explanation) but it's still a bit higher than on the

Re: [freenet-support] Interesting observations regarding performance

2004-02-18 Thread Toad
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 03:36:52PM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote: On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:42:48 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Memory usage on both? Roughly the same at ~150Mb (javaw process) Knock down the xferrate a bit from 11kb/s, it dropped a while after I sent that mess (I