>> when the node starts up, the rt gets cleaned, so no bad refs are left.
>> then, while the node is running only good refs are added to the rt.
>>=20
>> then why are connections from incompatible (e.g. stable/unstable) nodes i=
>n the OCM?
>> because they contacted us?
>> then why aren't they reje
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 11:43:29PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> then wrong noderefs can only slip into the rt when the local rt already h=
> >as these bad references (e.g. when switching von unstable->stable or the ot=
> >her way around without purging the rt) or when importing new=20
> >>
>> then wrong noderefs can only slip into the rt when the local rt already h=
>as these bad references (e.g. when switching von unstable->stable or the ot=
>her way around without purging the rt) or when importing new=20
>> seednodes which contain these bad refs.
>>=20
>> would it be useful if the
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 11:31:23PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> why not have some sanity checks when importing seed files or adding node =
> >refs to the routing table? we'll all be luckier with this and in the long r=
> >un the generated seednode files are much less polluted (why aren't=20
>> why not have some sanity checks when importing seed files or adding node =
>refs to the routing table? we'll all be luckier with this and in the long r=
>un the generated seednode files are much less polluted (why aren't=20
>
>We do.
oh, good :)
then wrong noderefs can only slip into the rt wh
ginal Message]
> >> From: Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Date: 1/14/2004 3:16:32 PM
> >> Subject: [freenet-support] Re: [freenet-dev] Please help: seednode sources
>
have my doubts).
> >
> >
> >> [Original Message]
> >> From: Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Date: 1/14/2004 3:16:32 PM
> >> Subject: [freenet-
l sure those node are all stable (have my doubts).
>
>
>> [Original Message]
>> From: Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: 1/14/2004 3:16:32 PM
>> Subject: [freenet-suppor
> Date: 1/14/2004 3:16:32 PM
> Subject: [freenet-support] Re: [freenet-dev] Please help: seednode sources
>
> It appears several nodes in the unstable list are running stable, and
> several nodes in the stable list are running unstable. Would ALL persons
> whose nodes are currently
It appears several nodes in the unstable list are running stable, and
several nodes in the stable list are running unstable. Would ALL persons
whose nodes are currently used as seednode sources please contact me and
tell me the URL and which branch it is currently running please.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2
10 matches
Mail list logo
