[freenet-support] Re: seednodes and update snapshot

2004-09-08 Thread Mika Hirvonen
Newsbyte writes: I'm not sure. I thought it WAS changed. There has been talk on the devl list about it, anyway, and I remember vaguely that toad (I think) said the right solution was to update the seednodes.ref, but set it on an earlier date, or something like that. That was before toad improved ro

[freenet-support] Re: seednodes and update snapshot

2004-09-08 Thread Mika Hirvonen
Björn Westerlund writes: Ok, here it is... I'm a comlete newbie, i probably could have found this information elsewere, i´v trid Frost, but cant see my on querstion after tree days (much less the answer), but if i do anything worng, please feel free to be angry! This is my question: I use windo

[freenet-support] Re: Seednodes

2004-07-31 Thread Someone
Toad schrieb: It's a bit perplexing. I get DNFs and RNFs; the RNFs don't seem particularly incredible... mostly. Yes, it's the same here in the first hours of runtime. But then the amount of backed off nodes reachs the number of connected nodes and stays there most of the time. Seems like the node

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Seednodes

2004-07-31 Thread Toad
It's a bit perplexing. I get DNFs and RNFs; the RNFs don't seem particularly incredible... mostly. On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 07:36:07PM +0200, Someone wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > > >I put a new permanent node online. (30GB storage for FN) > > > >But I can't really "surf" on freenet, not m

[freenet-support] Re: Seednodes

2004-07-31 Thread Someone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: I put a new permanent node online. (30GB storage for FN) But I can't really "surf" on freenet, not much opens. I'm getting very often this: Route Not Found messages mean that your node, or the rest of the network, didn't find the data or enough nodes to send the request t