On Tuesday 11 January 2011 10:10:01 Daxter wrote:
>
> On Dec 18, 2010, at 1:04 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday 14 December 2010 16:27:17 Daxter wrote:
> >> I know that's there (I noted that in my original message). We're currently
> >> on build 1310, though, not 1306. The problem is
On Dec 18, 2010, at 1:04 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 December 2010 16:27:17 Daxter wrote:
>> I know that's there (I noted that in my original message). We're currently
>> on build 1310, though, not 1306. The problem isn't that no source code is
>> available; it's that [a] the l
On Tuesday 14 December 2010 16:27:17 Daxter wrote:
> I know that's there (I noted that in my original message). We're currently on
> build 1310, though, not 1306. The problem isn't that no source code is
> available; it's that [a] the link on our main website consistently 404's and
> [b] the mo
I know that's there (I noted that in my original message). We're currently on
build 1310, though, not 1306. The problem isn't that no source code is
available; it's that [a] the link on our main website consistently 404's and
[b] the most recent source isn't available through the only method no
Check
http://code.google.com/p/freenet/downloads/detail?name=freenet-build01306-source.tar.bz2&can=2&q=
Mel Charters
mcharter...@q.com
On Dec 14, 2010, at 2:27 AM, Daxter wrote:
I noticed this problem previously but I never bothered until now to
report it. That is, the /download.html page o
I noticed this problem previously but I never bothered until now to report it.
That is, the /download.html page on freenetproject.org has a link to source
code that rarely can actually be accessed. The last line of the page links to
the source code here:
http://freenet.googlecode.com/files/free
