On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 03:23:19PM -0400, Doug Bostrom wrote:
> On Monday 28 October 2002 08:30 am, you wrote:
> > Hmm. If you know what you are doing,
>
> Aye, there's the rub! But going back to original question, if a 6xx node is
> running ok, aside from nonfatal developmental bugs, will it len
On Monday 28 October 2002 08:30 am, you wrote:
> Hmm. If you know what you are doing,
Aye, there's the rub! But going back to original question, if a 6xx node is
running ok, aside from nonfatal developmental bugs, will it lend support to
the .5 network?
--
"Sometimes things aren't exactly blac
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 01:00:26AM -0500, Doug Bostrom wrote:
> At this point is it better for Freenet for a persistent node to be running .5 or the
>600 builds, if a node
> operator must choose?
Hmm. If you know what you are doing, then probably run the unstable
series, with load balancing turne
At this point is it better for Freenet for a persistent node to be running .5 or the
600 builds, if a node
operator must choose?
--
"Democracies die behind closed doors."
- Judge Damon Keith
___
support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.fr
