Re: [freenet-support] results w/527

2002-10-29 Thread Doug Bostrom
10/29/02 9:59:00 PM, Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Interesting. The bandwidth limiter is not working then? Not as far as I can tell, or least very little. I have bandwidth set to 8k both ways, threads set to 20, and I'm showing something like 200 processes right just now and my co

Re: [freenet-support] results w/527

2002-10-29 Thread Matthew Toseland
e new wininstaller. > - Original Message - > From: "Doug Bostrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 5:19 PM > Subject: [freenet-support] results w/527 > > > > Pipe still saturates. I cut maxthreads

Re: [freenet-support] results w/527

2002-10-29 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 08:19:31PM -0500, Doug Bostrom wrote: > Pipe still saturates. I cut maxthreads to 40, then 20. Connections stayed at 45, >pooled jobs at 98, java > processes somewhere over 100. Load at 90+. You did use the up to date start-freenet.sh, or nice -n 10 it directly? That shoul

Re: [freenet-support] results w/527

2002-10-29 Thread Mike
i just updated to 527, and now im at 89-133% this time , it is dragging my system to a crawl :P bleh... the fun starts. - Original Message - From: "Doug Bostrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 5:19 PM Subject: [free

[freenet-support] results w/527

2002-10-29 Thread Doug Bostrom
Pipe still saturates. I cut maxthreads to 40, then 20. Connections stayed at 45, pooled jobs at 98, java processes somewhere over 100. Load at 90+. Bandwidth adjustments via freenet.conf have zero effect. OTH, I don't see in the support thread that others are having the same issue with saturat