2004 2:15 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Problems with Freenet: from a
> windowsperspective.
>
>
> Transient isn't that relevant anymore; the current build in
> CVS has all
> traces of the Transient property removed.
>
> So you won
Transient isn't that relevant anymore; the current build in CVS has all
traces of the Transient property removed.
So you won't notice much of a difference using this property on stable
(build 5091).
On Thursday 19 August 2004 03:05 am, Don Gregory wrote:
> Well, I HAVE bumped into the half-open
Well, I HAVE bumped into the half-open connection limit once or twice.
Mostly it's an issue for people using P2P clients, edonkey, overnet,
etc... It's easy enough to fix anway.
I did some reading on the subject, and the recommendation I got was to
manually change the config file to have "Transie
yeah... castrated.. lol
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Wooledge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet
___
suppo
Mike ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> actually, it comes to me as attachments. anf the attachments are 1 txt and 1
> DAT
That's how PGP signed e-mails look. Your e-mail client is Outlook
Express -- it can't handle MIME properly. (Or your MTA has been broken
beyond repair.)
> most likely because of
ober 28, 2002 12:54 PM
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 12:45:42PM -0800, Mike wrote:
> sorry, matthew, but your replies come to me as garbeled attachments. my
> server stips attachments, as a virus security precaution. can you re
reply
> to this
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 12:45:42PM -0800, Mike wrote:
> sorry, matthew, but your replies come to me as garbeled attachments. my
> server stips attachments, as a virus security precaution. can you re reply
> to this thread. thanks.
Your server is fscked. My client does not send HTML attachments, i
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:support-admin@;freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Mike
> Sent: 28 October 2002 13:46
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet
>
>
> sorry, matthew, but your replies come to me as garbeled attachments. my
> serve
nt: Monday, October 28, 2002 12:37 PM
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet
___
support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
my uniformed guess is that since all routing of data is done totally
peer to peer, the network is going to be pretty flakey for the next few
hours while all these new slashdot nodes come online. its just a matter
of dillution... suddenly there is a massive flood of nodes that dont
know how to
boom, try this...
right click on the rabbit, and select configure and select the Fproxy,
for giggles. set the port to 8081
to test the connectivity.
I was using the default port and i had the same issue. changed it to
8081 (it is the default for the 0.4 release) and now i get many sites.
:P
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 08:33:52PM -, Boom wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi there :)
>
> Nice software.. I totally think this is an excellent idea for protecting peoples
>freedom of speech and expression, if too radical for many people from the US to deal
On Saturday, October 20, 2001, at 05:52 PM, Zachary Copley wrote:
> I'm having terrible trouble gettting Freenet 0.3.9.2 to work with Mac OS
> X 10.1. The node starts up, but then I can't retrieve any keys.
Well, since the latest release of Freenet doesn't work with Mac
OS X 10.1 (even though
13 matches
Mail list logo
