2009/12/20 Thomas Franck :
> Joachim Ott wrote:
>> 2009/12/20 Thomas Franck :
>> One other thing I noticed in your log:
>>
>> [21474537.74] nand_read_bbt: Bad block at 0x0202
>>
>> That bad block is within the rootfs, I hope that it is remapped correctly.
>
> Hmm.. well spotted.. :)
> l
Joachim Ott wrote:
> 2009/12/20 Thomas Franck :
> One other thing I noticed in your log:
>
> [21474537.74] nand_read_bbt: Bad block at 0x0202
>
> That bad block is within the rootfs, I hope that it is remapped correctly.
Hmm.. well spotted.. :)
looking through the wiki now.. seems on
2009/12/20 Thomas Franck :
> David Fokkema wrote:
>> So... what images did you flash? I've seen this on my FR with some
>> images. When I tried UBIFS images, for example, I got the CPU stall. I
>> simply took that as non-working UBIFS, but I'm not sure. When I
>> reflashed with shr-testing from 11
Using the charger to boot worked, thanks a lot!
Now after 1 day of charging, the battery state is still zero bars.
The battery icon is still in the "charging" state, but if I unplug the
charger I get 0 bars and the "very low" battery alarm.
I tried reverting to the "dumb" battery meter, and
David Fokkema wrote:
> So... what images did you flash? I've seen this on my FR with some
> images. When I tried UBIFS images, for example, I got the CPU stall. I
> simply took that as non-working UBIFS, but I'm not sure. When I
> reflashed with shr-testing from 11 dec (jffs2 into NAND) and uImage
