Re: Om 2008.8 - Battery indicator

2008-08-11 Thread Dale Schumacher
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Steven ** <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What does apm say? It seemed pretty accurate on OM2007.2. And I know > it at least reports some status on Om2008.8. > > -Steven > > On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 11:35 PM, sparky mat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Is there some way

Re: Worrisome output from "opkg -test update" in 2007.2

2008-08-03 Thread Dale Schumacher
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Olivier Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Dale Schumacher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Thank you. I really appreciate the work-around for gtk+. >> >> However I think this represents an example of a deeper issue. Ho

Re: Worrisome output from "opkg -test update" in 2007.2

2008-08-03 Thread Dale Schumacher
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 6:35 AM, Jeffrey Ratcliffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/8/2 Olivier Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Doing an opkg remove gtk+-fastscaling and opkg upgrade gtk+ solved the >> issue, I think. YMMV though. > > I needed > > opkg remove -force-depends gtk+-fastscaling > > but

Worrisome output from "opkg -test update" in 2007.2

2008-08-01 Thread Dale Schumacher
I'm running 2007.2. My last opkg update/upgrade was 2008-07-24. I've been watching for a stable point to upgrade and thought now might be it. I started with "opkg update". After that completed, I tried "opkg -test update". This resulted in several messages that concern me. This first group is