ly impacted users,
> which allows the format to grow in popularity."
Yeah it's a trap.
Wolfgang
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:10:17PM +0200, Joachim Ott wrote:
> 2009/9/10 Al Johnson :
> > On Thursday 10 September 2009, rakshat hooja wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 a
Again: I'm not a lawyer. The details may vary from jurisdiction to
jurisdiction. Lawyers also know how to stay in business :-)
Wolfgang
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 08:38:44PM +0530, rakshat hooja wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Wolfgang Spraul
> wrote:
>
> > Rakshat,
early separated.
Wolfgang
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 06:57:34PM +0530, rakshat hooja wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Wolfgang Spraul
> wrote:
>
> > CQIT,
> >
> > > Intone I don't have. But thanks for the advice I will try. Does it play
> > only ogg
CQIT,
> Intone I don't have. But thanks for the advice I will try. Does it play only
> ogg or also mp3?
Also curious about m...@intone, I hope it does not play MP3. Until all
patents have safely expired I would not want to touch MP3...
Wolfgang
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 12:26:11AM -0700, CQIT Con
Robin,
> there's been discussion over this before, several people have
> pointed out it's a shoddy way to do things. apparently openmoko sign
> their own certificates (i think), so it's not recognised as coming
> from a certificate authority.
It's a long story, but definitely not a 'shoddy way'.
Peter,
can you try to post this on the kernel list? openmoko-ker...@lists.openmoko.org
Best Regards,
Wolfgang
On Jan 26, 2009, at 7:45 AM, Peter Strapp wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have come across what appears to be quite a nasty little bug.
> After a
> while the right hand side of the display begin
Wolfgang
On Jan 19, 2009, at 10:20 AM, Craig Woodward wrote:
>
> Wolfgang Spraul wrote:
>> Repeating rumors again and again still doesn't make them true.
>
> Is this a rumor? PLEASE CLARIFY. Will the GTA01 continue to get
> software support from OM in it'
onal GTA01 in Taipei
Anything else?
Thanks and Best Regards,
Wolfgang
On Jan 19, 2009, at 10:20 AM, Craig Woodward wrote:
>
> Wolfgang Spraul wrote:
>> Repeating rumors again and again still doesn't make them true.
>
> Is this a rumor? PLEASE CLARIFY. Will the G
Craig,
> The GTA01 folks waited almost 2 years and now OM has dropped support
> for that device, so they're stuck with a puck. OM has clearly said
> they will NOT be working on GTA01 and more, and there's not a stable
> image for it, probably never will be.
Repeating rumors again and again
Gothnet,
> Will do, was going to wait a few weeks - Milestone 5 is out sometime
> this
> month IIRC?
Yes, according to the roadmap it's January 31st:
http://trac.freesmartphone.org/roadmap
Wolfgang
On Jan 10, 2009, at 12:04 AM, Gothnet wrote:
>
>
>
> Markku wrote:
>>
>> I'd just like to say,
Paul,
> create a working phone. Passing the buck to FSO is passing the torch
> to someone else. This is what OM has done.
We are funding FSO. This is called teamwork :-)
FSO concentrates on the framework, and standardizing interfaces for
mobile phones. FSO = freesmartphone.org
Openmoko concen
Sargun,
thanks, agree with you.
> I want someone from FR (steve mosher? sean moss?) to post updates and
> a timeline. I want them to say when things will be fixed, what exact
> developments are going on at OM, etc... This has to be on a regular
> basis. They -need- a blog or a similar method to pu
Karthik,
> this. I am sure that a developer who talks back against this will just
> get fired/have to face bad consequences.
Honestly, together with pretty much everything else you say, it's wrong.
In fact internally I am known as the one who kicks people if they
don't post publicly :-)
Your pr
Paul,
> Let's be honest here FIC is making a pretty penny off of OpenMoko,
> using very old hardware selling at a premium price (2.5g not even
> EDGE). Yet we are OK with that.
If you don't know you shouldn't pretend to know.
I applaud the brave investors we have, we have a long way to go to
m
Jay,
> Not me! I witnessed all the work that went into OM 2007.2 over the
> last couple of years - including the days of OE - and when it was all
> chucked out for 'the new stuff' it was, frankly, a bit miserable.
The only thing that was 'chucked out' was the matchbox window manager.
It was a
Lon,
ASU will turn into OM 2008.8
Eventually FSO will turn into OM 2009 or so.
From Openmoko's perspective, it's one 'stream' of images, and we care
a lot about application compatibility. So for example for OM 2008.8,
we want all OM 2007.2 apps to work.
Like tangoGPS.
We want it to be easy for
16 matches
Mail list logo
