You don't need to mess with uboot environment anymore. Download the
kernel in the android forum at forum.koolu.org in the "Android Pre-built
image..." thread, where the kernel is under 2M.
Android works well, but the phone is unusable still in my opinion. It's
so quiet that you can't hear ANYTHI
Craig Woodward wrote:
>
> Funny you mention that... it's the last on my list, since I've tried most
> of the others but this one has failed to boot after several attempts. I
> got a new uSD card just for this setup to see if thats what's preventing
> the boot.
>
Two things I found that sto
Funny you mention that... it's the last on my list, since I've tried most of
the others but this one has failed to boot after several attempts. I got a
new uSD card just for this setup to see if thats what's preventing the boot.
So far the only one that works with calls and SMS well is QT, bu
To Craig and other (fellow) whiners:
Try Android. You'll need to update your uboot environment to allow for a
bigger kernel, but go here:
http://panicking.kicks-ass.org/download/
And check out:
http://panicking.kicks-ass.org/blog/
It's not quite production ready yet (in fact it has some show
Hello.
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 01:38, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
> Am Monday 19 January 2009 03:50:15 schrieb Wolfgang Spraul:
>
> > 3. .28 kernel - not sure exactly what the current status of the .28
> > kernel on GTA01 is, but I know some people are working on it
>
> Stefan?
Testing it is st
Am Monday 19 January 2009 03:50:15 schrieb Wolfgang Spraul:
> Do you see any problems with GTA01 support in Om2009?
> Here is what I can think of:
>
> 1. image size - seems we will have no problem, Om2009 should be less
> than 64MB?
Current FSO-images are a bit fat around the hips (80MB), but we c
Question: I have 2008.12 and have set the feeds to testing - however I
have seen only one update (I think) to e come through (opkg update;opkg
upgrade). To get the latest goodies should we reflash then?
r...@om-gta02:~# cat /etc/opkg/*
src/gz daily-Multiverse
http://downloads.openmok
Craig,
> Is this a rumor? PLEASE CLARIFY. Will the GTA01 continue to get
> software support from OM in it's baseline release (OM2xxx series)?
Yes. We are trying!
Just look at http://downloads.openmoko.org/daily/testing/
There are images for GTA01 and GTA02, and this is where the base of
Mickey,
(in response to Craig)
> The only reply from OM until now was from "Mickey", who wrote the
> the posting attached below. As I read it, it screamed to me that OM
> was trying to quietly drop support for the 01 without saying it
> directly. Mickey choose his words very carefully, whi
Craig Woodward wrote:
> Wolfgang Spraul wrote:
>> Repeating rumors again and again still doesn't make them true.
> Within days of the December release there were questions about future
> GTA01 support, and it was said on the OM list that OM was no longer
> supporting the GTA01 in the OM2xxx
Wolfgang Spraul wrote:
> Repeating rumors again and again still doesn't make them true.
Is this a rumor? PLEASE CLARIFY. Will the GTA01 continue to get software
support from OM in it's baseline release (OM2xxx series)?
If the answer is yes, then I'm much happier. If not, then it's ju
wolfgang,
could you put that in the wiki, together with the statements regarding the
buzz fix, for further reference? ("Allegations, Accusations and Rumors" or
so)
it would help a lot to stop needless complaints jamming the lists ...
___
support mai
Craig,
> The GTA01 folks waited almost 2 years and now OM has dropped support
> for that device, so they're stuck with a puck. OM has clearly said
> they will NOT be working on GTA01 and more, and there's not a stable
> image for it, probably never will be.
Repeating rumors again and again
Neil Benn wrote:
>Hmm, to be fair the webpage itself says that the FreeRunner is only for power
>users and developers and is not ready for the general consumer.
Yes Neil, it does NOW. But 9 months ago when FIC originally started selling
the FreeRunner, when *I* bought it, they clearly sa
I have to agree with everything you have said Craig, and I too get annoyed when
I'm told I'm a whiner ;)
I bought the first batch of Freerunners back in July 2008. Back then they
definitely did NOT have a
disclaimer on the Web site or purchase page saying it didn't actually work as a
phone. Ba
Hello,
Hmm, to be fair the webpage itself says that the FreeRunner is only
for power users and developers and is not ready for the general consumer. I
actually purchased it for a handheld device which can act as a USB host and
runs linux (I installed debian on it). So far I am happy tha
, and as i said , its the only one of its kind , so
just give it some time and it will rock ;)--- On Sat, 1/17/09, Warren Baird
wrote:
From: Warren Baird
Subject: Re: Experiences with GTA02 and OM2008.12 (was part of the "Brick"
thread)
To: "Support for Openmoko Device Owners&q
Hey Craig,
Unfortunately your experience matches pretty well the experience I had with
the OM2008.8 distro. I switched to QtE 4.4.2 when it came out, and have
had a much better experience - I haven't encountered missed calls or SMSs.
The only tweaking I did was to turn on suspend in the power ma
First off, I want to thank Tom for the blog pages he has setup. They're a
great reference for setting up the OM base software, and really should be put
on the main Wiki release pages somewhere. I'd say the out-of-box
functionality of most of the OM releases is highly enhanced if you follow th
19 matches
Mail list logo
