Re: FSO Milestone 5

2009-03-01 Thread Daniel Willmann
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 11:27:01 +0200 Alon Levy wrote: > worked for me on the neo1973 (minus sms, which is the same problem I > had with previous versions). What kind of problem is that? I did a quick search in trac, but couldn't find any bug about it. Regards, Daniel Willmann signature.asc Descr

Re: [FSO] Milestone 5, uBoot and SD, any success?

2009-02-11 Thread Angus Ainslie
On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 09:59 +0530, Andy Green wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Somebody in the thread at some point said: > > | Rename the file from checkroot.sh to checkroot, and it achieves the same > | effect (it is run in a shell instead of being sourced). > | > |

Re: [FSO] Milestone 5, uBoot and SD, any success?

2009-02-11 Thread Andy Green
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Somebody in the thread at some point said: | Rename the file from checkroot.sh to checkroot, and it achieves the same | effect (it is run in a shell instead of being sourced). | | As I said previously, this was an upstream OE bug which made it's way |

Re: [FSO] Milestone 5, uBoot and SD, any success?

2009-02-11 Thread Rod Whitby
Andy Green wrote: > Somebody in the thread at some point said: > | On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Marc Bantle wrote: > | > |> Until current rootfs' get fixed, I dropped the 'ro' option in > |> the boot options. > | > | Thanks to all of you for you help. But I tried something else : Marek > | Li

Re: [FSO] Milestone 5, uBoot and SD, any success?

2009-02-11 Thread Andy Green
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Somebody in the thread at some point said: | On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Marc Bantle wrote: | |> Until current rootfs' get fixed, I dropped the 'ro' option in |> the boot options. | | Thanks to all of you for you help. But I tried something else

Re: [FSO] Milestone 5, uBoot and SD, any success?

2009-02-11 Thread Olivier Migeot
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Marc Bantle wrote: > Until current rootfs' get fixed, I dropped the 'ro' option in > the boot options. Thanks to all of you for you help. But I tried something else : Marek Lindner just provided the steps for fixing the image. Here it is: Not sure whether some

Re: [FSO] Milestone 5, uBoot and SD, any success?

2009-02-10 Thread Marc Bantle
Olivier Migeot schrieb: > - GTA02 > - images (.tar.gz and .bin) from the fso-stable tree. > - basic uBoot (no update whatsoever since purchase) > - and of course, booting on the SD card (once again, I don't want to > break every part at once) > > > I succesfully use openmoko-fso-image-glibc

Re: [FSO] Milestone 5, uBoot and SD, any success?

2009-02-10 Thread Kosa
Werner Almesberger escribió: > Kosa wrote: >> GTA02v5 # setenv menu_10 Boot for FSO V: setenv bootargs >> ${bootargs_base} rootfstype=ext2 root=/dev/mmcblk0p2 rootdelay=5 >> ${mtdparts} rw\; mmcinit\; fatload mmc 1 0x3200 ${sd_image_name}\; >> bootm 0x3200 > > A quick remark: You proba

Re: [FSO] Milestone 5, uBoot and SD, any success?

2009-02-10 Thread Werner Almesberger
Kosa wrote: > GTA02v5 # setenv menu_10 Boot for FSO V: setenv bootargs > ${bootargs_base} rootfstype=ext2 root=/dev/mmcblk0p2 rootdelay=5 > ${mtdparts} rw\; mmcinit\; fatload mmc 1 0x3200 ${sd_image_name}\; > bootm 0x3200 A quick remark: You probably want to escape the dollar signs as w

Re: [FSO] Milestone 5, uBoot and SD, any success?

2009-02-10 Thread Kosa
Olivier Migeot escribió: > Hello ev'ryone. > > It's been a while since Freesmartphone's latest milestone (the > so-called "milestone 5") is out. However, and as willing as I am to > test it, I still didn't manage to get past the "root not remouted > read-write as it should" problem. > > I saw a l

[FSO] Milestone 5, uBoot and SD, any success?

2009-02-10 Thread Olivier Migeot
Hello ev'ryone. It's been a while since Freesmartphone's latest milestone (the so-called "milestone 5") is out. However, and as willing as I am to test it, I still didn't manage to get past the "root not remouted read-write as it should" problem. I saw a lot of discussion about how to fix this wi

Re: FSO Milestone 5

2009-02-07 Thread Olivier Migeot
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 1:34 AM, Petr Vanek wrote: >>Rename checkroot.sh to just checkroot (remove the .sh). >>This is an upstream OE bug which made it's way into FSO ms5 - it also > > no change here, still ends up ro. shr 29.1, all upgraded now, qi Doesn't work here either (GTA02, uboot, booting

Re: FSO Milestone 5

2009-02-07 Thread Petr Vanek
>Rename checkroot.sh to just checkroot (remove the .sh). >This is an upstream OE bug which made it's way into FSO ms5 - it also no change here, still ends up ro. shr 29.1, all upgraded now, qi Petr ___ support mailing list support@lists.openmoko.org h

Re: FSO Milestone 5

2009-02-07 Thread Rod Whitby
Rename checkroot.sh to just checkroot (remove the .sh). This is an upstream OE bug which made it's way into FSO ms5 - it also affected nslu2-linux SlugOS images. -- Rod -Original Message- From: Joel Newkirk Date: Sunday, Feb 8, 2009 8:18 am Subject: Re: FSO Milestone 5 To: Suppor

Re: FSO Milestone 5

2009-02-07 Thread Joel Newkirk
gt; followed the logic of the script yet but am guessing that if it's not >> ext2/3 it never reaches the remount,rw statement there.) >> >> >> j >> >> >> >>> I guess that there could be something causing some kernel module not to >>&

Re: FSO Milestone 5

2009-02-07 Thread Petr Vanek
>I believe you need a file /boot/append-GTA02 (given that you are using >a GTA02 model), which on my Freerunner contains: > >rw loglevel=8 rootdelay=5 glamo_core.slow_memory=1 what you say is correct but we are treating symptoms, rather then addressing the issue. as andy pointed, the rootfs shoul

Re: FSO Milestone 5

2009-02-07 Thread Erland Lewin
2009/2/7 Simon Comeau Martel > > / is in read-only mode when I boot from Qi. (and in rw mode when I boot > from uBoot) I believe you need a file /boot/append-GTA02 (given that you are using a GTA02 model), which on my Freerunner contains: rw loglevel=8 rootdelay=5 glamo_core.slow_memory=1 Wher

Re: FSO Milestone 5

2009-02-06 Thread Simon Comeau Martel
followed the logic of the script yet but am guessing that if it's not > ext2/3 it never reaches the remount,rw statement there.) > > > j > > > >> I guess that there could be something causing some kernel module not to >> load? >> >> Maybe I sh

Re: FSO Milestone 5

2009-02-06 Thread Carl Lobo
> It's not immediately obvious how Qi can trash the GSM connection and > leave everything else OK. As in, if that was a feature we wanted to add > to Qi, I don't know how we would do that. This happened to me a couple of times, even rebooting didn't fix it. I had to completely power down the phon

Re: FSO Milestone 5

2009-02-06 Thread Joel Newkirk
ry upgrading to a more recent version of Qi? The one I > use is: > > qi-s3c2442-master_2ad3ce6ff57753e3.udfu > (md5sum: 88979a8310a98d7a2189977194cb2607) > > Let me know if there is anything I can do to diagnose that problem. > > Is FSO Milestone 5 working fine for someone who use Qi? > > -- &g

Re: FSO Milestone 5

2009-02-06 Thread Simon Comeau Martel
to load? Maybe I should try upgrading to a more recent version of Qi? The one I use is: qi-s3c2442-master_2ad3ce6ff57753e3.udfu (md5sum: 88979a8310a98d7a2189977194cb2607) Let me know if there is anything I can do to diagnose that problem. Is FSO Milestone 5 working fine for someone who use Qi

Re: FSO Milestone 5

2009-02-06 Thread Andy Green
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Somebody in the thread at some point said: | My install of FSO M5 is not on a SD card. | | As I said, all my problems where related to the fact I was using Qi, | instead of uBoot. It's not immediately obvious how Qi can trash the GSM connection and l

Re: FSO Milestone 5

2009-02-06 Thread Paul
Thanks for all the replies, I have downloaded the files and will reflash tonight. I'll let you know how it goes. On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Simon Comeau Martel wrote: > My install of FSO M5 is not on a SD card. > > As I said, all my problems where related to the fact I was using Qi, > inst

Re: FSO Milestone 5

2009-02-06 Thread Simon Comeau Martel
My install of FSO M5 is not on a SD card. As I said, all my problems where related to the fact I was using Qi, instead of uBoot. -- Simon Comeau Martel si...@comeau.info https://comeau.info yves mahe wrote: > I think the problem arise when you try to boot FSO M5 from SD. > The filesystem is mou

Re: FSO Milestone 5

2009-02-06 Thread yves mahe
I think the problem arise when you try to boot FSO M5 from SD. The filesystem is mounted read-only and X don't start. Unfortunately, it seems that right now, nobody has a patch to correct that. See also http://n2.nabble.com/Freesmartphone.org-Milestone-5-%27Calling-All-Stations%27-Release-tp22610

Re: FSO Milestone 5

2009-02-05 Thread Simon Comeau Martel
I had that problem. It was happening to me when I booted with Qi. Booting from uBoot (from NOR) solved the problem. After that first 'successful' boot, the GUI start if I boot from Qi, but then I get other problems. ie: GSM doesn't work. Booting from uBoot solve the problem. I have no idea why

Re: FSO Milestone 5

2009-02-05 Thread Alon Levy
worked for me on the neo1973 (minus sms, which is the same problem I had with previous versions). used http://downloads.freesmartphone.org/fso-stable/milestone5/om-gta01/openmoko-fso-image-glibc-ipk--20090202-om-gta01.rootfs.jffs2and http://downloads.freesmartphone.org/fso-stable/milestone5/om-gta

FSO Milestone 5

2009-02-04 Thread Paul
Has anyone gotten milestone 5 to work? I've tried 5 of the rootfs images and all I get is a prompt. I keep rebooting, yet same thing. If you have, can you send me the exact names of the images you used? Thanks. -- Paul Email - pault...@gmail.com There were moments when he looked on evil simp