Thats fine and all but what if you loose a web server?
We're currently working on what you have here in addition to a
monitoring daemon which will remove servers from a pool if it stops
answering requests.
Scott
On 7/22/05, alan walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry that was an accident. D
Long story short: ignore it.
Scott
On 7/22/05, Chris Buechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/22/05, alan walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Jul 22 09:51:11
> >
> > kernel: arp_rtrequest: bad gateway 10.250.3.1 (!AF_LINK)
> >
> > Jul 22 09:51:11
> >
> > kernel: arp_rtreques
I have done some testing today with inbound NAT and carp
And round robin load balancing to test web servers.
I added the following rules to each of my carp firewalls in
/tmp/rules.debug and reset the rules with pfctl.
The only issue that I can see is if the connection goes down you might
have to
This might also be helpful:
http://pfsense.blogspot.com/2005/06/multi-wan.html
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Daniel Solsona [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 22. Juli 2005 13:56
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: [pfSense Support] Question about load balancing between tw
Hi Daniel,
this is (almost) possible. At the moment pfSense only supports one
PPPOE-Connection, so you will have to use a router as workaround for the second
wan that connects via pppoe. You can put the pfsense-OPT1 as DMZ-IP in this
Router and connect opt1 to the lan of the router that makes t
Sorry that was an accident. Did not mean to send it
-Original Message-
From: alan walters
Sent: 22 July 2005 15:11
To: 'Bill Marquette'; Scott Ullrich
Cc: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] round robin on inbound nat
I have done some testing today with inbound NAT and
I have done some testing today with inbound NAT and carp
And round robin load balancing to test web servers.
I added the following and it seems to work fine on bsd.
Following presumptions
#
rl1= wan
192.168.2.2 = carp virtual ip
Below was the test.
##
##
On 7/22/05, alan walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Jul 22 09:51:11
>
> kernel: arp_rtrequest: bad gateway 10.250.3.1 (!AF_LINK)
>
> Jul 22 09:51:11
>
> kernel: arp_rtrequest: bad gateway 192.168.168.10 (!AF_LINK)
>
> Jul 22 09:51:11
>
> kernel: arp_rtrequest: bad gateway
Hi,
Actually I'm using a soekris box with m0n0wall and it works great, but we are
looking for load balancing between two adsl lines.
I have looked the redundant cluster tutorial, but I think that is for 2
pfsense and only one internet connection.
What we want is to have the box with:
Wan inte
Jul 22 09:51:11
kernel: arp_rtrequest: bad gateway 10.250.3.1 (!AF_LINK)
Jul 22 09:51:11
kernel: arp_rtrequest: bad gateway 192.168.168.10
(!AF_LINK)
Jul 22 09:51:11
kernel: arp_rtrequest: bad gateway 192.168.168.8
(!AF_LINK)
Jul 22 09:51:11
kernel: arp_r
I would check that proxy arp is on.
And set up a temp rule for imcp so you can ping your router if you can
get a reply from the router on png then at least you can eliminate that
connection is fine to the router and the issue is pfsense.
I did not see anywhere where you outlined your version???
-
11 matches
Mail list logo
