AW: [pfSense Support] iperf question

2005-08-18 Thread Holger Bauer
From the m0n0 documentation (hidden options in the config.xml file). Same like m0n0: interfaces/(if)/media and interfaces/(if)/mediaopt If you need to force your NIC to a specific media type (e.g. 10Base-T half duplex), you can use these two options. Refer to the appropriate FreeBSD manpage

[pfSense Support] Mirror ?'s

2005-08-18 Thread David L. Strout
All, Is it safe to assume that the 08.18.2005 date on the 76.4.iso means that there has been some re-working done on that image and I should try it again? I first saw this iso on 08.16.2005 and tried it then but it failed / hung on the old Waiting for Backend screen. Sorry for my ignorance,

[pfSense Support] Carp and syncing rules?

2005-08-18 Thread M. Kohn
OK, because I can't use private IP's on WAN, I victimize 3 official IPs and start the first real test of pfsense ;-) I've an setup with 6 Interfaces (1 SYNC,1 LAN, 1 WLAN, 1 DMZ and 2 WAN). At this time 1 WAN and the WLAN interface are not in use. I enabled CARP and defined few rules. The

[pfSense Support] ipsec and 0.77

2005-08-18 Thread alan walters
I don't know about this I still am seeing problems with ipsec Auto generated rules being wrong and an empty tunnel still being made with 0.77. I know this is nothing to do with the above problem but 0.77 is problematic with ipsec mobile clients and no tunnels created.

Re: [pfSense Support] ipsec and 0.77

2005-08-18 Thread Scott Ullrich
Is this a fresh configuration? On 8/18/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't know about this I still am seeing problems with ipsec Auto generated rules being wrong and an empty tunnel still being made with 0.77. I know this is nothing to do with the above problem but 0.77 is

RE: [pfSense Support] ipsec and 0.77

2005-08-18 Thread alan walters
An upgrade from 0.48 Had to change the ipsec part of the xml file to delete the crap from the upgrade. But whenever you save a new rule it adds a blank tunnel again. And creates rubbish rules. -Original Message- From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 August 2005 20:42

Re: [pfSense Support] ipsec and 0.77

2005-08-18 Thread Scott Ullrich
You have to zap the entire ipsec section after upgrading or this can continue to be a problem On 8/18/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: An upgrade from 0.48 Had to change the ipsec part of the xml file to delete the crap from the upgrade. But whenever you save a new rule it

Re: [pfSense Support] iperf question

2005-08-18 Thread Chris Buechler
On 8/17/05, Randy B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know this isn't likely the best forum for this question, but please bear with me. I've been seeing a lot of these iperf comments/questions, and decided to try to track down why my connection to my home firewall seems *so slow*. Installed the