Edit /etc/platform with Diagnostics -> Edit File and replace with pfSense
Reboot and you will be back to normal.
Sorry about that!
Scott
On 9/13/05, Robo.K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After upgrade to 0.84.2 appears in menu SYSTEM in item PLATFORM this -
> WARP.
> And this appears in 0.84.
After upgrade to 0.84.2 appears in menu SYSTEM in item PLATFORM this -
WARP.
And this appears in 0.84.2 after change from pfsense drop-down face to
pfsense classical design.
Warning: fopen(/tmp/config.cache): failed to open stream: Read-only file
system in /etc/inc/config.inc on line 204 War
Warning: fopen(/tmp/config.cache): failed to open stream: Read-only file system in /etc/inc/config.inc on line 204
Warning: fwrite(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in /etc/inc/config.inc on line 205
Warning: fclose(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in /etc/inc
Thanks Chris, I just now saw your email about the display being wrong.
Todd
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Buechler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 3:16 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Autodetect & CPU Usage
Scott Ullrich wrote:
2- On the "System
2- On the "System Overview" screen I show the following:
CPU usage: 67%
Memory usage: 29%
SWAP usage: 0%
Disk usage: 3%
Should be fixed in CVS Erik redid all of our meters in ajax.
---
OK, how would I get the fix? Is it already available?
Also, are you saying that the display is just wrong? I
Run top from /exec.php to see the real #'s until you upgrade to the
latest version (when we release it)
Scott
On 9/13/05, Chris Buechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scott Ullrich wrote:
>
> >>2- On the "System Overview" screen I show the following:
> >>
> >>CPU usage: 67%
> >>Memory usage: 29%
Scott Ullrich wrote:
2- On the "System Overview" screen I show the following:
CPU usage: 67%
Memory usage: 29%
SWAP usage: 0%
Disk usage: 3%
Should be fixed in CVS Erik redid all of our meters in ajax.
I might add it's a display quirk that's been going on for a while now,
it wasn't a
On 9/13/05, Mojo Jojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, loaded up M0n0wall first and played with that a while and now I have
> installed PfSense.
>
> Two things I noticed so far that I found curious, maybe you folks could
> comment.
>
> 1- When installing M0n0wall earlier on the same piece of hard
OK, loaded up M0n0wall first and played with that a while and now I have
installed PfSense.
Two things I noticed so far that I found curious, maybe you folks could
comment.
1- When installing M0n0wall earlier on the same piece of hardware (see below
for hardware specs) the "a" option for aut
http://wiki.pfsense.com/wikka.php?wakka=BootTroubleShooting
On 9/13/05, Christiano Farina Haesbaert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I've downloaded the pfsense-0.84, when i try to boot it says it cant find
> alot of binarys, i mean critical binarys, like php, getty and etc.
>
> What do i do ?
>
Hi, I've downloaded the pfsense-0.84, when i try to boot it says it cant find
alot of binarys, i mean critical binarys, like php, getty and etc.
What do i do ?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Here it is as requested. All these files seem have the same size.
Though the files seem to work. I tested a few.
# ls -lr /rescue
total 364906
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 2937504 Sep 9 23:28 zcat
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 2937504 Sep 9 23:28 whoami
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 2937504 Sep 9 23:2
At 11:44 AM 9/13/2005, John Cianfarani wrote:
On my none vmware system I have it running on it looks to do the same thing.
# df -h
Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a3.9G433M3.1G12%/
devfs 1.0K1.0K 0B 100%/dev
# du -h /
On my none vmware system I have it running on it looks to do the same thing.
# df -h
Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a3.9G433M3.1G12%/
devfs 1.0K1.0K 0B 100%/dev
# du -h /rescue
356M/rescue
System specs
CPU: Celer
Woops! Can you please open a ticket for this at
http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/tktnew and include the notes that you did
in the email so we don't forget. Thanks!
On 9/13/05, Ben Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I installed pfSense a few days ago using pfSense-LiveCD-0.84.iso (the
> version fro
Ok, not a problem.. The important (for me) is to know that in a "normal" installation it is differentOn 9/13/05, John Cianfarani <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a version installed under vmware gsx
3.2 as well and I notice the same thing.
John
I have a version installed under vmware gsx
3.2 as well and I notice the same thing.
John
From: Tommaso Di
Donato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005
3:40 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support]
/rescue directory
Hi!
I did a n
ack, I'll poke at this shortly. I had some "interesting"
experiences with the bandwidth fields when writing the wizard.
They shouldn't be needed - realtime/upperlimit/linkshare are supposed
to be better. What I found was that bandwidth is needed so that
pfctl doesn't bitch about bandwidth being
Tier 2 platform, don't even both with it until it's a Tier 1 platform unless you like fixing things.
http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/ppc.html
I'd also like to point out that we've had nothing but issues with usb
keyboards and that's all that currently works in the PPC port.
Wait another year and
HI
That is exactly as it stands right now .. i.e. the only thing carp creates for
me is a LAN gateway (Virtual). I have also tried it with or without outbound
LB. No difference.
There is No NAT ( inbound )and No Virtual WAN IP. I only use it for outbound
redundancy.
As I say it works well if
CARP doesn't work well together with dynamic adresses or better said, they
don't play together at all. You might want to use carp in this configuration
only at lan. this way you are able to failover but the clients will have to
restart the sessions after a failover took place (won't be stateful)
A major flaw until yesterday as to where the cache file is located had gone
undetected. We will be fixing that today. I will post to the list when the
file has been updated. It may be te fix.
-Erik
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:15:12 +0200, Frimmel, Ivan \(ISS South Africa\) wrote
> Router 2 has gone i
At 08:40 AM 9/13/2005, Frimmel, Ivan \(ISS South Africa\) wrote:
My
routers have been up for sometime before 0.84 and after .. du h
gives ~3Mb on both. No VMware.
i'm running vanilla 0.84 and i get:
# du -h /rescue/
2.8M /rescue/
My routers have been up for sometime before
0.84 and after .. du –h gives ~3Mb on both. No VMware.
From: Tommaso Di
Donato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 September 2005 11:33 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support]
/rescue directory
mmh. I did a fr
Sorry I don't understand exactly... my CONFIG as follows:
OPT1 : 192.168.10.0 /24 (SYNC)Crossover as per tutorial.
WAN: PPPoE with DHCP from ISP separate user accounts (2 different IPs on
WAN )
LAN: 172.16.24.0/28
So the OPT1 has static IPs when CARP starts. Does WAN (PPPoE) also have
to be U
Router 2 has gone into a weird non responsive, non verbose boot mode,
seems quite common after a upgrade. I don't have the skills or time to
fix it.. so I am going to reload tonight, I have already broken the carp
so it can stay broken short term.
I am happy to allow remote access to the dev team
I installed pfSense a few days ago using pfSense-LiveCD-0.84.iso (the
version from 09/11/05).
I've observed this bug also. After examining the source of the file
firewall_shaper_queues_edit.php I came to the following conclusion:
* When using HFSC, the bandwidth input box doesn't appear.
* Becaus
mmh. I did a fresh install.. and I obtain exactly the same:
# du -h /rescue/
365M /rescue/
Could this be a bug in 0.84 LiveCD, or may it depends on that I install it over a vmware Virtual Machine?
Tom
On 9/12/05, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Try a reinstall. All of my boxes are ~3
Hi!
I did a new install, and this is what I obtain:
# df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a 496M 437M 19M 96% /
devfs
1.0K 1.0K
0B 100% /dev
# du -h /rescue/
356M /rescue/
The only think I could imagine is that this is
29 matches
Mail list logo
