I have the following situation at a site:
- 1 pfsense box connected to the internet and lan (194.1.1.41)
- lan behind pfsense box (nat) (194.1.1.0/24)
- proxy (squid) box in lan (194.1.1.31)
- a few clients in the lan
The last few weeks internet was really slow. I first started to look
at the s
Here is what I am seeing in the logs, thanks:
Sep 25 06:41:42 dhclient[7846]: DHCPDISCOVER on fxp0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 13
Sep 25 06:41:42 dhclient[7846]: DHCPOFFER from 192.168.0.1
Sep 25 06:41:42 dhclient[7846]: Bogus domain search list 15: domain_not_set.invalid (doma
On 9/25/05, Jeroen Hermans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have the following situation at a site:
>
> - 1 pfsense box connected to the internet and lan (194.1.1.41)
> - lan behind pfsense box (nat) (194.1.1.0/24)
> - proxy (squid) box in lan (194.1.1.31)
> - a few clients in the lan
>
> The last fe
Hello,
I’ve got a PC with 3 identical NIC’s in
it. I have a landline internet connection and a satellite internet
connection. I would like to use PFsense to use the landline when
it’s up, and then fail over to the satellite if the landline goes
down. So far, I have added my static
On 9/25/05, Matt Fanady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hello,
> I've got a PC with 3 identical NIC's in it. I have a landline internet
> connection and a satellite internet connection. I would like to use PFsense
> to use the landline when it's up, and then fail over to the satellite if the
Also:
# more dhclient.conf
dhclient.conf: Too many levels of symbolic links
#
On 9/25/05, Jeff Quinonez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here is what I am seeing in the logs, thanks:
Sep 25 06:41:42 dhclient[7846]: DHCPDISCOVER on fxp0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 13
Sep 25 06:41:42 dhcli
Bummerthanks for the quick response!
-M@
-Original Message-
From: Bill Marquette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2005 8:44 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] dual WAN failover
On 9/25/05, Matt Fanady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> H
Hi All,
I am testing 0.85.2 installed on a 6GB HD on an old Compaq Deskpro EN SFF (PII
350 Mhz)
with 2 x "fxp" nic and an atheros card.
I found 2 problems on this config.
1.) WiFi doesn't work in wep mode if only I isssue an "ifconfig ath0 authmode
shared"
command. No matter that I set on th
http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/timeline
On 9/25/05, Jeroen Geusebroek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a changelist available somewhere? It would be nice to know
> what's changed in the new version.
>
> --
> Jeroen
>
> -
On 9/25/05, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/timeline
Great, thanks!
--
Jeroen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/timeline.rss for those that love to
watch changes in near real time ;)
--Bill
On 9/25/05, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/timeline
>
> On 9/25/05, Jeroen Geusebroek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there a changelis
Hi,
Is there a changelist available somewhere? It would be nice to know
what's changed in the new version.
--
Jeroen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
please do:
ls -la /var/etc/dhclient.conf
ls -la /etc/dhclient.conf
Scott
On 9/25/05, Jeff Quinonez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also:
> # more dhclient.conf
> dhclient.conf: Too many levels of symbolic links
> #
>
>
>
> On 9/25/05, Jeff Quinonez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Here is what I
This just happen again after about two days of uptime.
Thing is, it's on totally different hardware.
So, same version 0.84, completely different hardware with same result.
I did this as Scott suggested while it was in this state and it did nothing
so I waited a bit then rebooted the box.
pfct
At 16:42 25-9-2005, you wrote:
On 9/25/05, Jeroen Hermans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have the following situation at a site:
>
> - 1 pfsense box connected to the internet and lan (194.1.1.41)
> - lan behind pfsense box (nat) (194.1.1.0/24)
> - proxy (squid) box in lan (194.1.1.31)
> - a few c
Sorry, should have included that:
# ls -la /var/etc/dhclient.conf
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 18 Sep 25 08:10 /var/etc/dhclient.conf -> /etc/dhclient.conf
# file /etc/dhclient.conf /etc/dhclient.conf: broken symbolic link to `/var/etc/dhclient.conf'
# ls -la /etc/dhclient.conf
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root
On 9/25/05, Mojo Jojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This just happen again after about two days of uptime.
>
> Thing is, it's on totally different hardware.
How different? Same CPU? Same NICS? Same power supply?
[snip]
> Makes me think it's not hardware at this point but that's just because I
On 9/25/05, Jeroen Hermans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Hmmm...slow the first time and fast the second possibly sounds like an
> >issue in DNS resolution somewhere. Are you using pfSense as your DNS
> >server for the LAN? Can you telnet to any host via IP address and see
> >if the results differ
Hi Folks,
I have observed the same behavior here today.
System is 0.85.2 with PPPoE on rl0 and LAN on fxp0
- With DynDNS deactivated all works ok.
mpd: [pppoe] IFACE: Up event
php: : Informational: DHClient spawned /etc/rc.newwanip and the new ip
is wan - 84.188.243.169.
php: : Informational
This is helpful, thanks. A commit was done a bit of ago that may
address this issue. If you can get connected to the internet, please
drop to a shell and issue:
update_file.sh /etc/inc/dyndns.class
Scott
On 9/25/05, Stefan R. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
>
> I have observed
How different? Same CPU? Same NICS? Same power supply?
As in totally different.. Different CPU, Different NICS, Motherboard brand,
RAM, Case, screws etc..
Funny that we don't get any other reports of this.
I have no motive here other than to use the product and possibly help w
On 9/25/05, Mojo Jojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> I have no motive here other than to use the product and possibly help where
> I can. It almost seems like you feel I am bashing PfSense or something, not
> really sure. Seems like a strange answer though if this is not your
> thought..
I do
On 9/25/05, Mojo Jojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> Ever heard of CARP? We have that you know.
> >>
>
> Yes, it's one of the reasons I chose your product over others.. However, I
> was going to set it up in case of unplanned failure of hardware or software.
> In this case, I am basically plann
sending your entire config.xml to the list or Scott directly if you need
to keep it private would likely help very much.
Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 9/25/05, Mojo Jojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
I have no motive here other than to use the product and possibly help where
I can. It almo
I'd like to see dmesg output from the new box as well. What kind of nics
do you have in this box? It really sounds like we need someway to gather
as much information as possible during the next outage without rebooting
the box. Off the top of my head some of the things I would like to know
are..
Se
:/ I think my mua hosed that message a little. If the first one doesn't
work try this one.
( dmesg ; echo ) >> /usr/crash.info ;
( netstat -in ; echo ) >> /usr/crash.info ;
( netstat -m ; echo ) >> /usr/crash.info ;
( top ; echo ) >> /usr/crash.info ;
( ps -ax ; echo ) >> /usr/crash.info ;
(
26 matches
Mail list logo
