Freeradius is marked as broken. We will look into the pfflowd issue.
On 10/18/05, lluner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have problem for start the services freeradius and
> pfflowd , do not start
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Promoção Yahoo! Acesso G
Isn't necessary, today it left to work. I experienced myself. What i
don't know is why it didn't happen to me before now ¿?
Rgds,
jonathan
Damien Dupertuis wrote:
After exactly one day, the wan-side stops working...
You turn the dyndns client off, restart pfsense and...
it works again...
I have problem for start the services freeradius and
pfflowd , do not start
___
Promoção Yahoo! Acesso Grátis: a cada hora navegada você acumula cupons e
concorre a mais de 500 prêmios! Participe! http://
That problem with 86.4 and dyndns client is already reported I think, and maybe
it's already solved.
Have you tried the same on 87.2 ?
Gabriel
-Original Message-
From: Damien Dupertuis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Martes, 18 de Octubre de 2005 07:10 p.m.
To: support@pfsense.co
After exactly one day, the wan-side stops working...
You turn the dyndns client off, restart pfsense and...
it works again...
If you want to know more, look at the archives...
regards...
Damien
--- Jonathan Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> What is exactly the problem? Does the syste
Our GUI is now out of sync with the newer version. We need someone
to fix this.
On 10/18/05, jonathan gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi group,
>
> i would like to know more about the state of the FreeRadius package that
> actually appears as "broken" in the package list:
>
> f
Hi group,
i would like to know more about the state of the FreeRadius package that
actually appears as "broken" in the package list:
freeradiusSecurityBROKEN 1.0.4
Thanks in advance,
Rgds,
jonathan
--
On 10/18/05, Robo.K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Excuse me for stupid questions,
> 1./i am not sure if or not is pfsense capable act as VPN ipsec server?If
> yes, how many connections /clients/can pfsense serve?
Yes. Depends on hardware.
> 2./i know that pfsense is capable act as PPTP server
Excuse me for stupid
questions,
1./i am not sure if
or not is pfsense capable act as VPN ipsec server?If yes, how many connections
/clients/can pfsense serve?
2./i know that
pfsense is capable act as PPTP server, but how many PPTP connections can pfsense
serve?
Thanx.
Bob.
--
No virus found i
Alex Moura wrote:
4) Noticed that the backup firewall carp interfaces screen isn't the
exactly the same that the tutorial shows: it's missing the icons and
is blank
where it should be showing
Sorry, I meant to say that the first and the last columns of the table
of the carp
Virtual IPs tab
And one minor thing I overlooked, on option 4 enter the "Remote System
Password" item as well.
On 10/18/05, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll quickly summarize the steps you need to take:
>
> 1. Setup the primary firewall with a unique IP for wan and lan that
> you will not be using
I'll quickly summarize the steps you need to take:
1. Setup the primary firewall with a unique IP for wan and lan that
you will not be using in the CARP failover group. Each firewall must
have it's own unique ip for both WAN and LAN.
2. Setup the secondary firewall with a unique IP for wan and la
Hello,
I'll lecture a training scheduled for next week, where I plan
to talk about pfSense, besides m0n0wall.
I'd like to show them the failover feature, but it didn't work
as expected, following the website's tutorial. I also did
searches at the mailing list history and I haven't found any
mess
That was the name before I gzipped it. It's correct and I will fix it.
On 10/18/05, David Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I noticed that when you upzip the current 0.87 ISO
> image that it unzips to an image called
> FreeBSIE.iso ... is that correct or is that a new
> naming convention? I a
I noticed that when you upzip the current 0.87 ISO
image that it unzips to an image called
FreeBSIE.iso ... is that correct or is that a new
naming convention? I am use to seeing the ISOs
named "pfSense-LiveCD-ver.iso"
Please forgive my ignorance.
--
David L. Strout
Engineering Systems Plus, LLC
What is exactly the problem? Does the system hungs or what happens?
jonathan
On 10/18/05, Damien Dupertuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Great... but remember, you'll have to wait one day so
> see the bug...
>
> I wish you could find it... becaus it bothers me ...
>
> Regards...
>
> Damien
>
>
>
Scott Ullrich wrote:
Manually update them via the firmware. The XMLRPC portion only shows
you when we update the version and we haven't focused our attention on
keeping this current. It's one of the final items to complete before
we release. And when I say complete, it really means hooking
Manually update them via the firmware. The XMLRPC portion only shows
you when we update the version and we haven't focused our attention on
keeping this current. It's one of the final items to complete before
we release. And when I say complete, it really means hooking in the
builder scripts
On 10/18/05, Chris Buechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the case of VPN's that are terminated on pfsense boxes, it is racoon,and very recently a kernel patch was added to test NAT-T support withipsec-tools. I'm not sure if it's even made it into a public release
yet. It'll be there soon if not,
Bill Marquette wrote:
On 10/18/05, Chris May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there a way to get the XMLRPC to work properly or is that not fixed
yet. I would like mine to function, even if the server is down, is there
a way for me to host my own version of XMLRPC locally on my apache server?
Tommaso Di Donato wrote:
Maybe I explained myself not very well: ipsec natively do not permit
to bypass NAT gateway. So few solutions have been adopted, uone of
them is NAT-T (that is, ipsec over UDP). I do not mean that it is
pfsense that must do this: generally it is the OS ipsec implementat
On 10/18/05, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/18/05, Tommaso Di Donato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Mmmh, sounds very strange.. IPsec NAT-T usually is achieved as IPsec over> UDP..
> (http://wiki.openswan.org/index.php/Firewalls)> ...and from what I know, Cisco VPN is using exaclt
Great... but remember, you'll have to wait one day so
see the bug...
I wish you could find it... becaus it bothers me ...
Regards...
Damien
--- Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit
:
> On 10/18/05, Damien Dupertuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > :-( It don't worked for me :-(
> >
> >
On 10/18/05, Tommaso Di Donato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mmmh, sounds very strange.. IPsec NAT-T usually is achieved as IPsec over
> UDP..
> (http://wiki.openswan.org/index.php/Firewalls)
> ...and from what I know, Cisco VPN is using exaclty this.
>
> What kind of implementation is currentl
On 10/18/05, Chris May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a way to get the XMLRPC to work properly or is that not fixed
> yet. I would like mine to function, even if the server is down, is there
> a way for me to host my own version of XMLRPC locally on my apache server?
If what you perceive to
On 10/18/05, Damien Dupertuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> :-( It don't worked for me :-(
>
> I've been running it without the dyndns client for 8
> days without a glitch...
>
> Maybe I should re-enable dyndns and see what
> happends...
>
> regards...
I'm on 86.4 on the only box I have that does p
If I understand correctly that means that dyndns-ipsec would have to
be installed at the office...that gives me incentive to switch from
m0n0wall at the office to pfsense :). Right now, pfsense is only at
home.
On 10/18/05, Holger Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have dyndns-ipsec support,
We have dyndns-ipsec support, however I have not set it up by now. Only heard
Scott implemented it. Other option (if you want to do it with the ping) would
be to add a cron-job to send a single ping once in a minute. However, as you
can't ping through the tunnel from the pfsense directly you wou
I'm using IPSec to connect from home to the office. At my home
address, I'm using DynDNS so I have the ip available. But when I'm at
work, the IPSec connection goes down as activity stops. Judging by
the documentation, there's no way to set up an outgoing IPSec
connection *to* a dynamic address.
Oct 18 09:43:20 racoon: DEBUG: === Oct 18 09:43:20
racoon: DEBUG: 188 bytes message received from 195.218.115.140[500] to
192.168.1.100[500] Oct 18 09:43:20
racoon: DEBUG: cd4fbccf a18d7f66 0d455d4b 554b207a 08102001 c9ab08ba
00bc 62bae5e7 d26b2921 361ebf5c 3c378227 d9540a69 a871a06
On 10/16/05, stephan schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Got the solution.In the vpn client connection configuration you have to choose"IPSec over TCP" and of course "Enable Transparent Tunnel".No custom rules, no "IPSec passthru" (that's a different approach),
no custom nat rules (only the defaul
:-( It don't worked for me :-(
I've been running it without the dyndns client for 8
days without a glitch...
Maybe I should re-enable dyndns and see what
happends...
regards...
--- jonathan gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> yes, i setup the built-in client. My version is
> 0.86.4
>
>
yes, i setup the built-in client. My version is 0.86.4
jonathan
Damien Dupertuis wrote:
Is your dyndns client on your pfsense box???
--- jonathan gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
hi,
i'm using PPPoE and dyndns client and i think it
doesn't affect me :(
Rgds,
jonathan
Damien
Is your dyndns client on your pfsense box???
--- jonathan gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> hi,
>
> i'm using PPPoE and dyndns client and i think it
> doesn't affect me :(
>
> Rgds,
>
> jonathan
>
>
>
>
>
> Damien Dupertuis wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Are you using pppoe and dyndns
34 matches
Mail list logo
