http://pfsense.com/mirror.php?section=tutorials/openvpn/pfsense-ovpn.pdf
Holger
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Horne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 4:55 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] an openvpn doc?
does a doc exist, that describ
does a doc exist, that described how to use openvpn to create a static tunnel
between two pfsense boxes?
thanks,
jonathan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Forgot this in my last reply, Turbo mode is also part of the "Super"
functions in the atheros chips:
Super G/Super AG mode includes dynamic 108 Mbps capability, real-time
hardware data compression, Fast Frames™ and standards-compliant bursting.
The reason I only mentioned Turbo is because the re
As i said in my previous mail:
http://wiki.pfsense.com/wikka.php?wakka=Wireless
note the lines:
ifconfig -m "IF-NAME" (lists modes)
ifconfig -v "IF-NAME" (view settings)
You will find stuff like -burst or burst etc. a lot of this stuff is
mediaopts.
-lsf
On 12/5/06, Carlos Rosário <[EMAIL PRO
On 12/5/06, Holger Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's the feature that pfSense doesn't have (yet):
Yet is the keyword. It's on my list, but I cannot disclose any timelines.
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT
That's the feature that pfSense doesn't have (yet):
Authoritative DNS & Inbound Load Balance
* A built-in authoritative DNS server supports MX, NS, A, CNAME, and
TXT records. (Screenshot...)
* DNS resolution balances inbound requests among available links.
However you might be able to a
Have you already seen
http://pfsense.com/mirror.php?section=tutorials/openvpn/pfsense-ovpn.pdf
?
Holger
-Original Message-
From: Alvaro Pietrobono [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 6:24 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] Routing LAN<-->tun0
H
Turbo Mode uses channel width of 40mhz while normal operation uses 20mhz and
every single channel takes 5mhz. This is why Turbo Mode is not a good thing
in the 802.11b/g networks, since the 2,4ghz band is already very populated,
and thats the reason I think the developer of the driver in FreeBSD d
um...WOW...thats severe overkill for what he needs. It also costs money. DNS
roundrobin is all he needs to use and thats free hopefully if he has a good
managed DNS service for his domain.
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 13:57:05 -0500> To:
> support@pfsense.com> Subject: Re: [
On Dec 5, 2006, at 12:06 PM, Jonathan Horne wrote:
our firewall is pfsense 1.0.1. could we use pfsense's load blancing
features to balance inbound httpd connetions across 2 connections?
i was
What you need is this:
http://www.peplink.com/productsLoader.php?productName=balance
we have on
On Dec 5, 2006, at 5:35 AM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
Ah, there's already one:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/105005
Still, file another one.
no, just add to the existing one so that the developers don't have to
do the work of merging the tickets.
smime.p7s
Description: S/
Jaye Mathisen wrote:
Can pfsense function as a PPTP client and server? It would be handy...
Server yes, client no.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can pfsense function as a PPTP client and server? It would be handy...
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If a package was yanked then it stopped working for some reason.
Scott
On 12/5/06, Bennett Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was just about to start testing the ASSP package on my home server,
but I see that apparently Scott yanked it back in July? Any reason why?
I barely see any mention of A
I was just about to start testing the ASSP package on my home server,
but I see that apparently Scott yanked it back in July? Any reason why?
I barely see any mention of ASSP...maybe that's why--lack of interest?
I, for one, would like to get it running on pfSense.
As for squid, I know it had pro
Oops, indeed. I was thinking multi server behind pfSense load
balancing. Yes, what Sean says is correct. May want to make sure
your server is not the bottleneck as well. I've been /.'d 4 times now
and I have been really lucky so far.
On 12/5/06, Sean Cavanaugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
he
he was asking about the WAN connections themselves being load-balanced in. I'm
assuming he only has the one server and that his bottleneck was just the
bandwidth. DNS round Robin is still the better answer fir his problem.
-Sean
> Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 12:22:55 -0500> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I configured an OpenVpn tunnel (client to server)
from a pfSense box to freebsd firewall. All seems ok
but packets don't route from tun0 to lan net and viceversa.
I can ping tunnel's ip from freebsd but not lan's ip.
I tried to disable nat and firewall rules (in pfSense) but
unsuccessfull.
you can load balance in if you set the DNS to round robin between the 2
separate IPs. this isnt really load-balancing with the router...its normal
Dual-WAN. you are right in thinking that load balancing is for internal users
going out.
so get the dual-WAN and set up the DNS server to round rob
On 12/5/06, Jonathan Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
last night, a site i admin for got slashdotted. the site owner wants to
put in another business cable line, but the ISP is unable to bond them
into a single double speed connection.
our firewall is pfsense 1.0.1. could we use pfsense's load
last night, a site i admin for got slashdotted. the site owner wants to
put in another business cable line, but the ISP is unable to bond them
into a single double speed connection.
our firewall is pfsense 1.0.1. could we use pfsense's load blancing
features to balance inbound httpd connetions a
To enable trubo mode check the turbo button, speed is still selected up to
54mbit, only difference is that with turbo enabled all speeds are 2x
whatever speed you choose.
Se the wiki for more info on manual ifconfig settings:
http://wiki.pfsense.com/wikka.php?wakka=Wireless
WPA2 is not fully imp
Ah,
Thanks, that helped :-)
I disabled the onboard NIC and now it works fine.
While I'm using a PowerEdge server and not a Precision workstation, my problem
seems to be the same the guys in this
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-October/029413.html
discussion have with wo
Christian Krützfeldt wrote:
I just tried the snapshot from the 29th of November, still the same error.
pfSense or freebsd thinks something is wrong with my Ram parity and then I get
the fatal trap.
The Dell diagnostics software say everything is ok.
I'm open for all suggestions on how to solv
I just tried the snapshot from the 29th of November, still the same error.
pfSense or freebsd thinks something is wrong with my Ram parity and then I get
the fatal trap.
The Dell diagnostics software say everything is ok.
I'm open for all suggestions on how to solve this problem.
Christian
>
25 matches
Mail list logo
