Thanks Raj
The modems web interface is, as you suggest, present at 192.168.100.1.
The modem is being used in a transparent mode (bridging?) as the static IP is
assigned on rl1. So far as I can tell it is not using
0.0 on the WAN side, it is using 3 digit numbers for the a.b.c.d IP address.
Ki
On 5/17/07, Tortise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Bill
for me
rl1 = WAN and Direct connected only to the Cable modem i.e. no switch sharing.
rl2 = LAN and connected to LAN switches.
Can I presume that means you have checked and confirmed there are no similar
messages in your System Logs?
I
Nowhere, there's no RC1 yet. You might mean Beta 1, it can be pulled
down from any of our official mirrors, listed on the downloads page.
--Bill
On 5/17/07, Anil garg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [E
Hello Everyone,
I did some searching and found this previous discussion on shaping
OpenVPN tunnels:
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?PHPSESSID=836df07da7c9becd9259e22e1847c7ae&topic=3013.0
Basically the discussion ended with, that you cannot shape the
OpenVPN tunnels because openvpn us
The general problem is not solved until now - encrypted tunnels cannot be
shaped...
There's the possibility to shape a whole OpenVPN tunnel (clientside) for
outgoing traffic, but I believe this is not what wou really want...
What you are planning is some sort of traffic shaping on port based rul
Well, if there would be some RC, I'd know I think... J
Some snapshot builds can be found here:
http://snapshots.pfsense.com/FreeBSD6/RELENG_1_2/
official builds can be found on the mirrors:
http://www.pfsense.org/mirror.php?section=downloads
http://www.pfsense.org/mirror.php?section=upda