Re: [pfSense Support] Re: Vulnerabities?

2007-07-12 Thread sai
On 7/12/07, Sean Cavanaugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: . . as for the pfSense people, they have a habit of working and fixing issues with the core of pfSense pretty soon after you notify them of the issue. its not uncommon for the FIRST response to a problem report to be try the snapshot in 2

Re: [pfSense Support] LAN access to virtual IP port forwards

2007-07-12 Thread Scott Ullrich
System - Advanced - Enable NAT Reflection. On 7/12/07, Dave Cabot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've got a setup where we have 5 public IPs coming in on a single modem/router. I've successfully setup the virtural IPs and all is working except for one small issue. When someone from the LAN side

RE: [pfSense Support] LAN access to virtual IP port forwards

2007-07-12 Thread Dave Cabot
Thanks Scott. Do I have to delete the NAT rules and reenter them? Dave -Original Message- From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 8:53 AM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] LAN access to virtual IP port forwards System -

[pfSense Support] Re: [pfSense tracker] Ticket 1378 updated by anonymous

2007-07-12 Thread David L. Strout
Scott All, Not really sure how to address this ticket back into the CVS Track system, but I appended my findings and from my prospective this one is a resolved issue. Sorry if this isn't the right place, but no login to CVS Track. Thanks again for the quick fix