On 7/12/07, Sean Cavanaugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.
.
as for the pfSense people, they have a habit of working and fixing issues
with the core of pfSense pretty soon after you notify them of the issue. its
not uncommon for the FIRST response to a problem report to be try the
snapshot in 2
System - Advanced - Enable NAT Reflection.
On 7/12/07, Dave Cabot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got a setup where we have 5 public IPs coming in on a single
modem/router. I've successfully setup the virtural IPs and all is working
except for one small issue. When someone from the LAN side
Thanks Scott. Do I have to delete the NAT rules and reenter them?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 8:53 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] LAN access to virtual IP port forwards
System -
Scott All,
Not really sure how to address this ticket back into the CVS Track
system, but I appended my findings and from my prospective this one
is a resolved issue. Sorry if this isn't the right place, but no
login to CVS Track.
Thanks again for the quick fix