Chris Buechler wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Curtis LaMasters
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure you can.
Outbound only, traffic coming in over OpenVPN is automatically allowed in 1.2.
thanks, that's what I meant.
-
Hi !
At one of my systems I have a strange issue, the file-system runs out of
space...
So is there the possibility to have some ls combination or else that can
check fort he biggest files in the fs instead of having me to search in
thousands of directories ?
Thanks,
martin
I made a df, it shows:
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/da0s1a 30376810 26361244 158542294%/
devfs 11 0 100%/dev
/dev/md0 1710 341540 2%/var/run
devfs 11 0 100%
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 8:33 AM, Fuchs, Martin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi !
At one of my systems I have a strange issue, the file-system runs out of
space...
So is there the possibility to have some ls combination or else that can
check fort he biggest files in the fs instead of having me
Cool !
Thanks a lot !
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Chris Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 22. August 2008 15:10
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: Re: [pfSense Support] filesystem runs out of space
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 8:33 AM, Fuchs, Martin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
you can use the switch -h (human readable). Also, try the following
combination, and increase the value at your taste
du -h --max-depth=1
Fuchs, Martin escreveu:
Cool !
Thanks a lot !
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Chris Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 22.
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 10:59 AM, David Meireles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you can use the switch -h (human readable). Also, try the following
combination, and increase the value at your taste
du -h --max-depth=1
Which is the same as du -hd1 that I suggested. :)
Jep, thanks a lot !
There were no bit files...
Just a reboot oft he box and the usage was not 94% but 0 %...
Strange, but true ;-)
Regards,
Martin
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Chris Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 22. August 2008 17:32
An: support@pfsense.com
Curious as to what your hunch was about the high ports (5 thru 65535)
as the 50K range are the ones that are getting blocked.
Thanks,
-phil
NAT issue? That setup is a little out of the norm as you have pointed out
but it should still work. An IP is and IP, a port is a port and a
Lucky guess. I'm not sure what the solution is. Can you paste your
firewall rules in regards to this situation.
Curtis LaMasters
http://www.curtis-lamasters.com
http://www.builtnetworks.com
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Phillip Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Curious as to what your
Hi list I'm currently migrating our dns server to new binds releases
due to daminsky vulnerability, but I'm hitting a rock because of the
disable of edns protocol, to do this test first I disable disable the
firewall in pfsense and in the os, but still bind is not able to work
with edns protocol,
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Aliet Santiesteban Sifontes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list I'm currently migrating our dns server to new binds releases
due to daminsky vulnerability, but I'm hitting a rock because of the
disable of edns protocol, to do this test first I disable disable the
Chris, here I attached the capture file, you can see this with
wireshark or etehreal, you will see the problem.
best regards
2008/8/22 Chris Buechler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Aliet Santiesteban Sifontes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list I'm currently migrating our dns
I did the capture on the dmz interface.
best regards
2008/8/22 Chris Buechler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Aliet Santiesteban Sifontes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list I'm currently migrating our dns server to new binds releases
due to daminsky vulnerability, but I'm
14 matches
Mail list logo