yeah, seems like the port forward option is working as it should. i
don't know why i didn't set it up this way to begin with. + as you
already pointed out i had the 1:1 rule messed up..
thanks,
-phil
On Sep 5, 2008, at 10:43 PM, Bill Marquette wrote:
I think you're dancing all around
sounds good. i'm going to give the port forward option a shot.
thanks,
-phil
On Sep 5, 2008, at 10:43 PM, Bill Marquette wrote:
I think you're dancing all around the solution :)
You need an inbound NAT or port forward for UDP ports 1-65535 pointing
to 10.0.0.1.
Alternately, a 1:1 NAT usin
I think you're dancing all around the solution :)
You need an inbound NAT or port forward for UDP ports 1-65535 pointing
to 10.0.0.1.
Alternately, a 1:1 NAT using YOUR external IP, not the IP of the
service (ie. 216.181.136.7 in your example below should be whatever
your external IP is, not that
Here is the raw logs of a call getting blocked.
Sep 5 21:52:07 fw-bsd-1.gnet pf: 20. 251565 rule 122/0(match): block
in on rl1: (tos 0x0, ttl 110, id 51208, offset 0, flags [DF], proto:
UDP (17), length: 854) 216.181.136.7.5065 > 75.129.xx.xx.58562: UDP,
length 826
Sep 5 21:52:08 fw-bsd-1
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 10:17 PM, BSD Wiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> man O man still getting blocked,
>
> tried calling my VoIP phone from my cell phone and the traffic was blocked
> again by the default drop all rule. below is the log entry of the blocked
> traffic.
>
>
> WAN 216.181.136
man O man still getting blocked,
tried calling my VoIP phone from my cell phone and the traffic was
blocked again by the default drop all rule. below is the log entry
of the blocked traffic.
WAN 216.181.136.7:5065 xx.xx.xx.xx:63792
this after allowing source 216.181.136.7
Hello fellow pfSense'ers! I've been using NAT to redirect TCP/80 traffic on a
subnet to a squid proxy server for quite some time. However, I've found that if
I use this functionality on any additional interfaces, connectivity to the
squid box gets extremely flaky. Running a constant ping shows t
I've tried to install the ntop package numerous times. It always stalls
out, sometimes at 2% sometimes at 20% download and never completes. Any
suggestions?
- Thanks
- Joel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For addi
* Paul Mansfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Fridtjof Busse wrote:
> > My ISP disconnects the PPPoE every 24h and upon reconnect, I get a
> > new IP address.
>
> worth paying for a static IP?
My provider doesn't offer static IPs and those that do cost
significantly more.
I'd prefer a fix in pfSense r
* "Fuchs, Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi !
>
> We're currently working on this afaik...
Thanks for the info.
Any intermediate solution?
--
Fridtjof Busse
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there!
This is no bug report - it's the opposite.
I am running pfsense embedded since 2005 now.
My current project www.netecdb.de depends a lot of 2 boxes in front of
theservers to run stable and failsafe.
The only outage i had during this time
Yeahh.. I've tried and this works fine.. :-)
There's any way to check blocked hosts? And how I can allow this host again?
Thanks a lot
Regards
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 03:22, Jeppe Øland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I did was simply set the firewall rule advanced settings. Here I
> set "2 Ma
Fridtjof Busse wrote:
> My ISP disconnects the PPPoE every 24h and upon reconnect, I get a new
> IP address.
worth paying for a static IP?
I found with our office's standby adsl service that they gave me a
static IP for free instead of charging $16/month when I phone to cancel
service!
-
BSD Wiz wrote:
>
> ah, i don't have any 1:1 nat entries, or static routes for this firewall
> issue. so when the traffic hits the WAN interface perhaps it's not
> always finding it's way to the voip box in the dmz?
>
> i have added a 1:1 mapping as follows:
>
> Interface External IP
Hi !
We're currently working on this afaik...
Regards,
Martin
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Fridtjof Busse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 5. September 2008 10:52
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: [pfSense Support] Trouble with NAT states
Hi,
I'm running pfSense 1.2-RELEA
Hi,
I'm running pfSense 1.2-RELEASE and have a problem with NAT-states:
My ISP disconnects the PPPoE every 24h and upon reconnect, I get a new
IP address. pfSense reconnects just fine, but the old NAT-states are
still there. Now the applications using those states (mostly keepalive)
cannot communi
16 matches
Mail list logo
