On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Paul Mansfield
wrote:
>
> In upgrading our firewall cluster whilst also renumbering the network,
> I've taken copies of the config, edited and uploaded to new machines. As
> part of process I've done diffs to check I've not screwed up!
>
> I've noticed there are a
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Jason Lixfeld
wrote:
> Hi Dimitri,
>
> It is a CARP address, yes and it does in fact match the mask on the WAN
> interface; they are both /28.
>
> After doing some more digging, I figured it out. It was a VMWare thing. I
> had to set the virtual adapter with a sec
Hi Dimitri,
It is a CARP address, yes and it does in fact match the mask on the
WAN interface; they are both /28.
After doing some more digging, I figured it out. It was a VMWare
thing. I had to set the virtual adapter with a security policy
exception to allow promiscuous mode.
There s
What kind of Virtual IP are you using? If you are using CARP addresses
(which is what I'm using), make sure your subnet mask actually matches your
WAN interface subnet mask.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Jason Lixfeld [mailto:jason-lists.pfse...@lixfeld.ca
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 2:08 AM, Lenny wrote:
> Bill Marquette wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Lenny wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm kind of desperate here, so please try to help me.
>>>
>>> Here's my problem:
>>>
>>> I have a setup in production (a very dynamic website).
>>>
>
In upgrading our firewall cluster whilst also renumbering the network,
I've taken copies of the config, edited and uploaded to new machines. As
part of process I've done diffs to check I've not screwed up!
I've noticed there are a number of FW options that don't get replicated,
namely "lb_use_sti
Hello, and happy holidays!
I have an ESXi server installed with the 1.2.1-RC2 VM upgraded to RC4
up and running. Everything has been working as expected, but then I
tried to setup outbound NAT to a virtual IP and everything stopped:
I've configured a Virtual IP on the WAN side which is on
I had same problem burning at 48X dropped to 12X disc was fine.
Same also happened with Mythbuntu 8.10, but not with Ubuntu Server 8.04. Not
sure if this is a burner issue or how the iso's are being generated. All the
iso's worked fine with vmware.
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 2:24 AM, Paul Mansfi
Alexandre F. Guimaraes wrote:
> I´ve new brand machine, since I put the new PfSense RC4, I got this error.
>
> Dec 19 22:00:01 kernel: ad4: FAILURE - READ_DMA48
> status=51 error=4 LBA=383226479
> Dec 19 22:00:01 kernel: ad4: WARNING - READ_DMA48 UDMA ICRC error
> (retrying request) LBA=38
