Re: [pfSense Support] RE: Load Balancer Using TCP

2009-04-04 Thread Chris Buechler
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Nathan Eisenberg wrote: > Here's what ends up in slbd.conf when I save my config: > > > > servicename:\ > >     :poolname=poolname:\ > >     :vip=x.x.x.x:\ > >     :vip-port=80:\ > >     :sitedown=x.x.x.x:\ > >     :sitedown-port=80:\ > >   

Re: [pfSense Support] IPsec VPN times out requires ping to restart

2009-04-04 Thread Chris Buechler
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Borowicz, Paul wrote: > I have a problem with a vpn between my pfsense box and an ASA box.  I've > noticed the same problem between PIX and pfsense.  The VPN works fine, but > when there is no traffic for awhile it will stop receiving connections.  The > ASA side wi

Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense gets RFC1918 address on WAN interface after reboot

2009-04-04 Thread Jonathan Reed
I used to see this happen a couple years ago when I worked for an ISP. I agree with Dimitri. Try his suggestion to find out if the ISP (likely the modem or their DHCP server) is the source of your 10.xxx lease. If you find this fixes it, then I would try the following: - Spoof a new WAN MAC ad

RE: [pfSense Support] pfSense gets RFC1918 address on WAN interface after reboot

2009-04-04 Thread Dimitri Rodis
The easiest way to see if it's something from the ISP's side is to boot up your pfSense with the WAN plugged into a switch _all by itself_, or boot up with a loopback adapter plugged into the WAN port. If it boots up and doesn't get an IP when it's set up like this, then it's something from the ISP

Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense gets RFC1918 address on WAN interface after reboot

2009-04-04 Thread Aarno Aukia
Can be anything... you're best off wiresharking the WAN interface during a reboot to see whether its anything from the outside... Although, this reminds me of a cable-operator here whose cable-modems are responsible for answering incoming dhcp-requests using the config they get via tftp. If one res