On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Ho Sy Tanhosy...@gmail.com wrote:
I run pfSense-1.2.3-RC1 (FreeBSD 7.1), IPSec with IKE P2 AES 256, it work
fine.
That's with the older ipsec-tools version. The latest one wants
different syntax.
Hello,
Is there a way, in pfsense, to give the highest priority over the rest
of the traffic to an application running on a particular port?
A VPN is connecting some branches where an application is running on
port 1. This application should have the highest priority over the
rest of the
Bastien DARMON wrote:
Hello,
Is there a way, in pfsense, to give the highest priority over the rest
of the traffic to an application running on a particular port?
A VPN is connecting some branches where an application is running on
port 1. This application should have the highest
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Bastien DARMONbdar...@horus-df.com wrote:
Hello,
Is there a way, in pfsense, to give the highest priority over the rest of
the traffic to an application running on a particular port?
You can shape this just like anything else, with the caveat that it
falls
On Jun 26, 2009, at 2:00 PM, Ian Levesque wrote:
We're running DHCP and DNS on a pair of CARPed pfSense 1.2.1 boxen.
Other than the fact that they don't sync DCHP entries, it's been
working OK for us. However, we've currently got them configured to
assign static IPs to specific MACs, and
Hello everybody,
I am in study phase to do a Wireless network and requirement is need to
force users authenticate first. I figured out that can be done with
Captive Portal feature of pfsense. However, I want to know if anybody
did a Wifi network with 1 main access point connect directly to
- Lunix1618 [mailto:lunix1...@gmail.com]
Hello everybody,
I am in study phase to do a Wireless network and requirement is need to
force users authenticate first. I figured out that can be done with
Captive Portal feature of pfsense. However, I want to know if anybody
did a Wifi network
