On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Tim A. wrote:
> Chris Buechler wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Tim A. wrote:
>
>
> I tried to push this to the repo but it keeps saying not allowed.
> Are you guys only using that internally?
>
>
>
> You can only push to your own clones unless you're an
Chris Buechler wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Tim A. wrote:
I tried to push this to the repo but it keeps saying not allowed.
Are you guys only using that internally?
You can only push to your own clones unless you're an authorized
committer, we don't let just anybody push ch
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 9:51 PM, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
>
> great news. just one question though. I use tinybsd for this embedded stuff,
> is there any way to shrink this image (any way I can do > myself, not the
> project do for me) to fit 128MB cf I already have ?
>
Not easily. You can't fit it
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:53:15 -0400
Chris Buechler wrote:
> For those who don't follow the blog:
>
> http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=472
great news. just one question though. I use tinybsd for this embedded stuff, is
there any way to shrink this image (any way I can do myself, not the project do
fo
For those who don't follow the blog:
http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=472
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
Commercial support available - https://porta
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Tim A. wrote:
>
> I tried to push this to the repo but it keeps saying not allowed.
> Are you guys only using that internally?
>
You can only push to your own clones unless you're an authorized
committer, we don't let just anybody push changes into official repos
(
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Tim A. wrote:
> Chris Buechler wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Tim A. wrote:
>
>
> Attached a patch against 1.2.3-rc2 adding support for auto configuring
> interfaces.
>
>
> That's definitely a nice feature, though only suitable for addition to
> 2.0, so
Chris Buechler wrote:
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Tim A. wrote:
Attached a patch against 1.2.3-rc2 adding support for auto configuring
interfaces.
That's definitely a nice feature, though only suitable for addition to
2.0, so we'll need a patch for 2.0. The only thing from your
de
Hello Dear All,
I need block msn messenger on local area.I research on forum.pfsense.org ...
I block 1863 port and msn access to 80,443 ...
I use squid proxy server, add to "Custom Options" on
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/Chat/MsnMessenger
acl msn url_regex -i gateway.dll;acl ms
Hello Dear All,
I need block msn messenger on local area.I research on forum.pfsense.org ...
I block 1863 port and msn access to 80,443 ...
I use squid proxy server, add to "Custom Options" on
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/Chat/MsnMessenger
acl msn url_regex -i gateway.dll;acl ms
> -Original Message-
> From: ozan ucar [mailto:m...@ozanucar.com]
> Sent: July 14, 2009 7:09 AM
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: [pfSense Support] Firewall Rules dont running
>
> Hi All,
> I use pfsense 1.2.3 , add two rule ;
>
> Proto SourcePort D
Hi All,
I use pfsense 1.2.3 , add two rule ;
Proto SourcePort Destination
Port Gateway Description
TCP/UDP LAN address 1863 (MSN) * * *
1863block
*LAN net *
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 08:27:29PM +0200, Michel Servaes wrote:
>
>Commonly it is said that both monowall & pfsense are not really
>recommended for direct WIFI access.
Michel,
please do not top-post and trim your replies.
>(I tried it some time ago too, and it worked now and then) -
13 matches
Mail list logo
