Re: [pfSense Support] Weird behaviour accessing from WAN to LAN using PAT on CARped system

2010-05-06 Thread Evgeny Yurchenko
Danny wrote: Hi, I´ve got to pfsense 1.2.3 boxes (CARPed), and I´m experiencing issues accessing from the outside to the inside using PAT. (From WAN to OPT2) I don´t think the problem are rules, becasue sometimes works and sometimes not I tcpdumped the traffic, and it seems is working but

Re: [pfSense Support] Weird behaviour accessing from WAN to LAN using PAT on CARped system

2010-05-06 Thread Danny
I know that, but default rule is always the last (hidden). There is a explicit rule to permit the traffic, if you read my mail, you will see that sometimes is working, So I think is not a problem with the rules... Thanks for your reply On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 11:40 PM, Hans Maes wrote: > Danny w

[pfSense Support] 2.0 traffic shaper reference

2010-05-06 Thread David Burgess
Is there a tutorial on the traffic shaper in 2.0? I read the related FAQ or wiki page (now I forget which), I ran the wizard and found the results not only confusing, but inconsistent with my responses, and I have scoured the forums. I don't understand why there is a floating interface, which is w

Re: [pfSense Support] Weird behaviour accessing from WAN to LAN using PAT on CARped system

2010-05-06 Thread Hans Maes
Danny wrote: PAT Rules are ok. Access rules ok, but sometimes I see dropped the traffic by default rule, when a couple of rules below there are a explicit rule to permit the traffic WAN and LAN Firewall rules are processed in a top-down order, first rule that matches is used, others below a

[pfSense Support] Weird behaviour accessing from WAN to LAN using PAT on CARped system

2010-05-06 Thread Danny
Hi, I´ve got to pfsense 1.2.3 boxes (CARPed), and I´m experiencing issues accessing from the outside to the inside using PAT. (From WAN to OPT2) I don´t think the problem are rules, becasue sometimes works and sometimes not I tcpdumped the traffic, and it seems is working but sometimes not... I

Re: [pfSense Support] 3 interface box with transparent bridge between 2 of them

2010-05-06 Thread drew Roberts
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Tim Dickson wrote: >> How would I go about not doing what I suggest above but instead setting WAN >> to a VLAN as you suggest? > > When setting up your NICS - choose YES to add VLANS. > Just add some extra VLANS even if you aren't using them. > OR you can set it up

RE: [pfSense Support] 3 interface box with transparent bridge between 2 of them

2010-05-06 Thread Tim Dickson
> How would I go about not doing what I suggest above but instead setting WAN > to a VLAN as you suggest? When setting up your NICS - choose YES to add VLANS. Just add some extra VLANS even if you aren't using them. OR you can set it up in the GUI after, by adding VLANS then assigning to the int

Re: [pfSense Support] 3 interface box with transparent bridge between 2 of them

2010-05-06 Thread drew Roberts
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Tim Dickson wrote: >>... Any idea as to 1.x and not plugging a cable into WAN while bridging 2 >>OPTs? > > Setup WAN to a VLAN - just to get it out of the way... I put in an extra nic so that I have a box with 4 nics. WAN configured but unused. LAN for management

RE: [pfSense Support] 3 interface box with transparent bridge between 2 of them

2010-05-06 Thread Tim Dickson
>... Any idea as to 1.x and not plugging a cable into WAN while bridging 2 OPTs? Setup WAN to a VLAN - just to get it out of the way... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: su

[pfSense Support] slow captive portal

2010-05-06 Thread Marc Boisis-Delavaud
Hello, I'm using pfsense as captive portal in our university, but the time to get the authentication page is very long (20-30s). My version is 1.2.3, load average is around 0,2, the only thing is a lot of error in lighttpd.error.log: 2010-05-06 16:01:08: (connections.c.292) SSL: 1 error:140760