Hi,
I just updated 2.0 Beta4 tonight with the latest snapshot and something broke
IPSEC configuration.
When clicking on a new IPSEC tunnel the following error appears.
Parse error: syntax error, unexpected '=' in
/usr/local/www/vpn_ipsec_phase1.php on line 515
--
Mark Street, D.C., RHCE
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Joseph L. Casale
wrote:
>>Make sure you follow all the steps here (order doesn't matter if you've
>>already done some/most)
>>http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/OpenVPN_Traffic_Filtering_on_1.2.3
>
> All done, and double checked. I actually use this for a standard
Sure it can.
Only government and business enterprises have to follow this "rules".
For more information you should contact a lawyer.
I'm sorry for off-topic here.
11.12.2010 19:04, Evgeny Yurchenko пишет:
On 10-12-11 06:46 AM, st41...@st41ker.net wrote:
Hi,
JFYI: you must use only those cryp
On 10-12-11 06:28 AM, drova...@kaluga-gov.ru wrote:
Hi, pfsense not send and recived ipsec message to remote gateway!
[snip]
Just do tcpdump on WAN and see whether you receive anything from remote site on
port 500.
-
To uns
On 10-12-11 06:46 AM, st41...@st41ker.net wrote:
Hi,
JFYI: you must use only those cryptographic services\alrorithms which
has been sertified by "ФСБ" and\or "ФСТЭК" (I'm not sure how it sounds
in English).
It seems like blowfish is under question in your case.
Hi,
just curious, can private com
>Make sure you follow all the steps here (order doesn't matter if you've
>already done some/most)
>http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/OpenVPN_Traffic_Filtering_on_1.2.3
All done, and double checked. I actually use this for a standard road warrior
setup for my first
openvpn config running on 1194,
Hi,
JFYI: you must use only those cryptographic services\alrorithms which
has been sertified by "ФСБ" and\or "ФСТЭК" (I'm not sure how it sounds
in English).
It seems like blowfish is under question in your case.
On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 14:28:26 +0300, drova...@kaluga-gov.ru wrote:
> Hi, pfsense not
The IPSec site-to-site link I have in place between two sites runs
over ADSL which I get from two different providers, one at each end.
One of them (BT) is blocking traffic on UDP port 500 and 4500. I
suspect the technical reasoning for this is because they are
twats...None the less, I have to use
Hi, pfsense not send and recived ipsec message to remote gateway!
Network topology:
192.168.8.0/24(LAN)-Pfsense 2.0
-(WAN)192.168.180.1192.168.180.13(WAN)-monowall
-(LAN)172.20.34.0/24
1.) If inicial coonections from remote net to local net (172.20.34.0/24 ->
192.168.8.0
Hello,
Understood. The requested changes has been made and the result is the
same.
Please, clarify, what exactly statistics do you need?
Here is complete output of netstat -ss
#uptime; netstat -ss
12:28PM up 33 mins, 2 users, load averages: 0.23, 0.23, 0.11
tcp:
14643 packets sent
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Joseph L. Casale
wrote:
>>What has to be done to let LAN clients access resources across the tunnel now
>>from the pfsense side of the config?
>
> Found http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,12888.0.html which worked well.
> I didn't use client-to-client and di
11 matches
Mail list logo
