Re: [pfSense Support] Some minor issues after upgrade

2011-03-30 Thread - Dickie Bradford -
On 3/26/2011 9:53 PM, - Dickie Bradford - wrote: Today I installed a New 2.0 RC1 pfsense build and then installed my backup config from 1.2.3. It went pretty well with minor issues that were easily fixed. One issue that is not easily fixed is this I have 3 interfaces, WAN (DHCP), LAN (1

Re: [pfSense Support] Some minor issues after upgrade

2011-03-30 Thread Chris Buechler
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 1:11 PM, - Dickie Bradford - wrote: > On 3/26/2011 9:53 PM, - Dickie Bradford - wrote: >> >> Today I installed a New 2.0 RC1 pfsense build  and then installed my >> backup config from 1.2.3.   It went pretty well with minor issues that were >> easily fixed.  One issue that

[pfSense Support] utilization question

2011-03-30 Thread k_o_l
I have been running 2.0-RC1 for the three weeks now, and I've noticed that early this week the number of processes jumped from 44 to 119 without any changes to the system, even after a reboot they stayed high. What could be the reason for the number of processes to increase if no new service were a

Re: [pfSense Support] utilization question

2011-03-30 Thread Jim Pingle
On 3/30/2011 9:13 PM, k_o_l wrote: > I have been running 2.0-RC1 for the three weeks now, and I've noticed that > early this week the number of processes jumped from 44 to 119 without any > changes to the system, even after a reboot they stayed high. What could be > the reason for the number of pro

[pfSense Support] squid+squidguard problem

2011-03-30 Thread Volkan VURAL
Hi, Squid+squidguard randomly stop filtering and pass all traffic. (pfsense 1.2.3, squid 2.7.9_4, squidGuard 1.4_3 pkg v.1.9) ... But another my pfsense system (pfsense 1.2.3, squid 2.7.9_4, squidGuard 1.3_1 pkg v.1.9) working good. When i add new squidguard packet than squid and squidguard not

RE: [pfSense Support] utilization question

2011-03-30 Thread k_o_l
> I have been running 2.0-RC1 for the three weeks now, and I've noticed that > early this week the number of processes jumped from 44 to 119 without any > changes to the system, even after a reboot they stayed high. What could be > the reason for the number of processes to increase if no new servi