Re: [pfSense Support] Cannot access the http://forum.pfsense.org/

2011-08-09 Thread TKOAK
Right, the *.pfsense.org is not blocked by the Chinese GFW. At present, I can visit any sub-domain at pfsense.org directly(without proxy), except the forum.pfsense.org. On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Chris Buechler wrote: > On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 1:55 AM, Bart Grefte wrote: >> You need a prox

[pfSense Support] imspector

2011-08-09 Thread Cleber L. Medina
Ola bom dia, qual versão do pfsense funciona melhor o imspector? o RC2 ou o release 1.2? Ja quebrei a cabeça e nada. Obrigado e a disposiçao Cleber - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional c

Re: [pfSense Support] BGP support in 2.0

2011-08-09 Thread Dan Candea
On 04.08.2011 00:11, Chris Buechler wrote: On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Adam Thompson wrote: I've been accepting ~ 13k routes inbound advertising nothing. So that part works, too. Now you just need confirmation from someone who does both! I setup one that does both last week, gets full I

[pfSense Support] imspector

2011-08-09 Thread Cleber L. Medina
I configured thje imspector on RC3, but it dont make any report... there are some bug? Thanks Cleber Medina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense 2.0 IPSec-VPN with Certs

2011-08-09 Thread Dan Candea
On 03.08.2011 14:46, Fuchs, Martin wrote: Hi ! Does anyone have mutual-RSA-IPSec VPN working with 2.0 ? All settings I tried do not work, I always get errors: racoon: ERROR: failed to get subjectAltName racoon: ERROR: racoon: ERROR: no peer's CERT payload found. These errors are away as so

[pfSense Support] Kingston SSD filesystem corruption

2011-08-09 Thread Jeppe Øland
Hi all, About a year ago, I switched to running the full pfSense 2.0 (beta something at the time) on a Kingston SS100S2/8G embedded SSD. Since then, every 3 months or so I noticed (in connection with installing a new release) that the filesystem was corrupted, and I have had to format the drive s

Re: [pfSense Support] Kingston SSD filesystem corruption

2011-08-09 Thread Jim Pingle
On 8/9/2011 11:33 AM, Jeppe Øland wrote: > About a year ago, I switched to running the full pfSense 2.0 (beta > something at the time) on a Kingston SS100S2/8G embedded SSD. > > Since then, every 3 months or so I noticed (in connection with > installing a new release) that the filesystem was corru

RE: [pfSense Support] Kingston SSD filesystem corruption

2011-08-09 Thread Tim Dickson
> About a year ago, I switched to running the full pfSense 2.0 (beta something > at the time) on a Kingston SS100S2/8G embedded SSD. I installed the 30G version in 12 systems, all of which failed within 6 months. I moved to Intel 320s and/or WD Greens (depending on budget of the site) so we'll

Re: [pfSense Support] Kingston SSD filesystem corruption

2011-08-09 Thread Bao Ha
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Tim Dickson wrote: > > About a year ago, I switched to running the full pfSense 2.0 (beta > something at the time) on a Kingston SS100S2/8G embedded SSD. > > I installed the 30G version in 12 systems, all of which failed within 6 > months. I moved to Intel 320s and

RE: [pfSense Support] Kingston SSD filesystem corruption

2011-08-09 Thread Adam Thompson
Even though it’s flash memory under the hood, SSDs are supposed to have wear-levelling algorithms baked into the firmware so that they function like a normal ATA HDD. I know of someone else who has deployed the Kingston SSDs into Windows XP machines (a *recommended* use case by Kingston), where

Re: [pfSense Support] Kingston SSD filesystem corruption

2011-08-09 Thread Jeppe Øland
> It appears that lower-price SSD manufacturers don’t do much testing of their > gear to validate expected service life.  Either that, or their expectations > of what ‘normal’ disk I/O patterns are doesn’t match reality. It's amazing how unreliable many SSDs still are :-( I had a OCZ Vertex 1 (In

Re: [pfSense Support] Kingston SSD filesystem corruption

2011-08-09 Thread David Rees
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Jeppe Øland wrote: > It's amazing how unreliable many SSDs still are :-( > > I had a OCZ Vertex 1 (Indilinx) in my home PC for 2 years ... every 3 > months it would corrupt fatally (BIOS wouldn't even see it). > After 3 RMAs I got them to replace it with a Vertex 2

Re: [pfSense Support] Kingston SSD filesystem corruption

2011-08-09 Thread Jeppe Øland
>> I had a OCZ Vertex 1 (Indilinx) in my home PC for 2 years ... every 3 >> months it would corrupt fatally (BIOS wouldn't even see it). >> After 3 RMAs I got them to replace it with a Vertex 2 (Sandforce), and >> that one is stable as a rock. >> ... Slightly slower than the Indilinx - but who care

Re: [pfSense Support] Kingston SSD filesystem corruption

2011-08-09 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 11:19:24AM -0700, Jeppe Øland wrote: > I guess I'll be best off putting something else in the box ... too > bad. I really liked the idea of a tiny SSD. I found all my small SSDs (with SLC, though) to be very reliable. On the other hand all my Intel SSD (several 10) with th

Re: [pfSense Support] Kingston SSD filesystem corruption

2011-08-09 Thread David Rees
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Jeppe Øland wrote: >>> I had a OCZ Vertex 1 (Indilinx) in my home PC for 2 years ... every 3 >>> months it would corrupt fatally (BIOS wouldn't even see it). >>> After 3 RMAs I got them to replace it with a Vertex 2 (Sandforce), and >>> that one is stable as a rock

Re: [pfSense Support] imspector

2011-08-09 Thread Bill Marquette
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Cleber L. Medina wrote: > I configured thje imspector on RC3, but it dont make any report... there > are some bug? > > Which imspector package did you use? Also, what protocol isn't logging? Thanks --Bill