Re: [pfSense Support] port 25

On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 1:19 AM, Kevin Kimani wrote: > Hi, > > Am experiencing trouble with my Pfsense firewall by it not being able > to relay mail to the internal mail server. One person can be able to > send mail outside the organization but receiving mail is still an > issue. When i do nmap, it

Re: [pfSense Support] no job control

On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Jim Pingle wrote: > You should probably be running one of the more recent nanobsd snapshots > anyhow, they can use all the testing they can get. :-) I didn't look at those because I'm running the FreeSwitch package. The blog post (http://blog.pfsense.org/?tag=nanob

Re: [pfSense Support] no job control

On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 6:10 AM, Jim Pingle wrote: > IIRC it was due to something trying to mute the video console while it > is really using serial. It is fixed (mostly?) on the 1.2.3-RC2 nanobsd > snapshots, and doesn't seem to happen on 2.0 either. I'm using 1.2.3-RC1 on a (headless) soekris ne

[pfSense Support] no job control

http://www.mail-archive.com/support@pfsense.com/msg05025.html After about 4 months on pfsense I'm now seeing this message in the console, "Warning: no access to tty (Inappropriate ioctl for device). Thus no job control in this shell." The above-linked thread is over three years old now, do we have

Re: [pfSense Support] Help with Siproxd

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Jeremy Bennett wrote: > When I install siproxd, everything looks good, however when I go to my > "services" page and press the "play/start" button, PFsense reports that > "siproxd has been started", but when the page refreshes, the status still > shows up as "stoppe

Re: [pfSense Support] A note about top vs bottom posting -- please read and make sure you bottom post on our lists. Thank you.

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Curtis LaMasters wrote: > How about now? Bottom posting? Bingo. Ha ha. Now Scott's saying no and I'm saying yes. In my view, you bottom-posted, although you could refine it further by trimming the quoted text to which you're replying. Not sure if that's Scott's

Re: [pfSense Support] A note about top vs bottom posting -- please read and make sure you bottom post on our lists. Thank you.

p://www.builtnetworks.com > > > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:40 PM, David Burgess wrote: >> Yes. >> >> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Curtis >> LaMasters wrote: >>> This is top posting apparently. >>> >>> Curtis LaMasters >>> http

Re: [pfSense Support] A note about top vs bottom posting -- please read and make sure you bottom post on our lists. Thank you.

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Curtis LaMasters wrote: > And this is bottom posting.  Correct? Well, I don't think it's top-posting or bottom-posting if you delete all prior content. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr.

Re: [pfSense Support] A note about top vs bottom posting -- please read and make sure you bottom post on our lists. Thank you.

to not top post? >>> >>> Curtis LaMasters >>> http://www.curtis-lamasters.com >>> http://www.builtnetworks.com >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:28 PM, David Burgess wrote: >>> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:25 A

Re: [pfSense Support] A note about top vs bottom posting -- please read and make sure you bottom post on our lists. Thank you.

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Curtis LaMasters wrote: > Thanks Scott. I know what top posting is...I just don't know why you > think I did.  I hit reply, type my message and go forth.  Didn't think > it needed to be any harder than that. It can be a lot harder than that. It's effectively illus

Re: [pfSense Support] Re: Can't get more than 15kpps.

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Lenny wrote: > Oh yeah, sorry, forgot to mention. > > The NIC is the same one: Dual Intel PCI-X. Have you ruled out your switches as bottleneck? db - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@

Re: [pfSense Support] Anything like fail2ban for PFSense?

On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Nathan Eisenberg wrote: > Hello Paul, > > I've considered that, but in this instance, it's not an option. I agree > that limiting exposure is a good first step, but I think brute force > protection regardless of source address could be a valuable next step. SSH

Re: [pfSense Support] Multiple WAN Interface and Specific Traffic to Each Interface

On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Ron Lemon wrote: > I have a pfSense box with a WAN link that goes to the internet. This is > where all the web surfing and e-mail comes and goes from. > > > > I have a second WAN link (OPT1) that goes to a pubic semi-private network > and I need to route traffic

Re: [pfSense Support] Web Interface Pages - Save Button

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:10 PM, Chris Buechler wrote: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:25 PM, Tim Nelson wrote: > > Chris Buechler wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Tim Nelson wrote: > >>> > >>> Hello fellow pfSensers! I've been quietly annoyed with a minor 'issue' > in > >>> pfSen

[pfSense Support] move media

Does anybody have experience or knowledge of Move Networks media streams? I want to enable multiple simultaneous client connections to a single stream without the degradation of shared bandwidth. I'm wondering if squid or some other software package might be configured to enable a type of packet p

Re: [pfSense Support] forum vs mailing list

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Chris Buechler wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 1:38 PM, JJB wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I didn't realize there is also a pfsense forum and that they are not >> connected. Which is the best place to post technical questions about >> configuration? My experience has bee

Re: [pfSense Support] state/connection questions

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:49 AM, wrote: > Hi > > Two questions. > > Is there a way to extract the state table to a text file, and if so, how? http://pfsense/exec.php $ pfctl -ss > /tmp/states.txt db - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [pfSense Support] Milliseconds latency QOS

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Jeppe Øland wrote: > >> >                 So... if a priorice a host over alll, why if I do a >> >                 ping from the priorized hots I have 27 millisenconds, >> >                 but when from othre host in the LAN I upload a file, >> >                 th

Re: [pfSense Support] keep alive

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Paul Cockings wrote: > Hello list, > > I have an annoyance that is driving me bonkers. I have a Windows XP > client, a pfsense 1.2.2 configured as a transparent firewall, development > webserver (FreeBSD 7.2) > > When I using SSH (Putty) or MySQL (SQLyog) to the

Re: [pfSense Support] running pfsense on soekris net5501

On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Joseph Wagner wrote: > I tried assigning the WAN to a new interface and that didn't work either.  I > even unplugged and plugged the cable and checked the status of the link in > the interface status page just to see if Pfsense was "looking" at the right > port.  I

Re: [pfSense Support] running pfsense on soekris net5501

On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Joseph Wagner wrote: > I power cycled it and it didn't help. It's one of those DSL modem/router > combos with 4 ethernet ports in it. I've plugged tons of stuff into this > thing over the years and I've never had to do anything special to get the > device to at l

Re: [pfSense Support] Recommended pfSense Hardware ( UK ~£100) ?

On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Paul Mansfield wrote: > Volker Kuhlmann wrote: > > Does anyone have experience with adapters to plug a standard PCI card > > into a mini-PCI slot, if this direction exists? I have some 4-port PCI > > cards around. > Have a look at these.

Re: [pfSense Support] Recommended pfSense Hardware ( UK ~£100) ?

soekris.com comes to mind. I use a net5501, but I think some of their less expensive boards might have 4 nics. Of course there is a variety of pci cards available that provide 2 or 4 nics as well. On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Volker Kuhlmann wrote: > On Sat 14 Feb 2009 02:14:35 NZDT +1300, Ga

Re: [pfSense Support] Milliseconds latency QOS

On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Jeppe Øland wrote: > So... if a priorice a host over alll, why if I do a ping from the priorized >> hots I have 27 millisenconds, but when from othre host in the LAN I upload a >> file, the latency of the icmp grows to 220-270? >> > > Yes that is normal. > Unless

Re: [pfSense Support] QoS with no ingress interface

On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:38 AM, wrote: > Your VOIP traffic is originating from the PFsense box itself?  there's no > interface that the trafffic comes in through?  does the traffic originate at > the machine's loopback interface? My voip traffic does originate from pfsense because I'm running

[pfSense Support] QoS with no ingress interface

I asked this on the forum but didn't get any info: http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,16361.0.html Basically I want to filter traffic that originates from pfsense itself. The traffic shaper GUI requires that I define an IN and OUT interface, which doesn't seem to apply in this case. I tried

Re: [pfSense Support] arm arch?

On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Paul Mansfield wrote: > Paul Mansfield wrote: >> In fact, I was looking at a new Atom mobo a little earlier which is much >> more power efficient: >> http://www.intel.com/support/motherboards/desktop/D945GSEJT/sb/CS-030300.htm > > the Poulsbo or US15W chipset also

Re: [pfSense Support] arm arch?

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Paul Mansfield wrote: > David Burgess wrote: >> With the AMD Geode going EOL, and the Atom being targeted more for ITX >> and desktop formats, it's getting harder to ignore devices like these. > > I think Intel are only just getting s

Re: [pfSense Support] arm arch?

On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Scott Ullrich wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 4:25 PM, David Burgess wrote: >> That's a good reason. What about using a NetBSD base? I suppose that >> would be another big job? > > More than you can imagine. I won't try then.

Re: [pfSense Support] arm arch?

On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:47 AM, RB wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:58, David Burgess wrote: >> I didn't see any discussion on the forums or in the archives of >> porting pfsense to the arm architecture. Is this on the horizon? Would >> it be a complicated project?

[pfSense Support] arm arch?

I didn't see any discussion on the forums or in the archives of porting pfsense to the arm architecture. Is this on the horizon? Would it be a complicated project? With the AMD Geode going EOL, and the Atom being targeted more for ITX and desktop formats, it's getting harder to ignore devices like

Re: [pfSense Support] bsnmpd eating cpu

2009/5/26 Chris Buechler : > The FreeBSD bsnmpd maintainer(s), though I'm not sure who that is. Isn't it Begemot? I can't remember the first name. db - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional comm

Re: [pfSense Support] dyndns on multiWAN

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Scott Ullrich wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:45 AM, David Burgess wrote: >> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Chris Buechler wrote: >> >>> You can't until 2.0. Only WAN is supported. >> >> Thanks for the quick r

Re: [pfSense Support] dyndns on multiWAN

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Chris Buechler wrote: > You can't until 2.0. Only WAN is supported. Thanks for the quick response. Not even by editing a file somewhere? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.c

[pfSense Support] dyndns on multiWAN

Hi, I see the question in the archives, but no answer. What would be the correct way to set up dynamic DNS on a multiwan setup? In other words, I have two WANs configured for dhcp with two ISPs and I want to be able to configure dynamic DNS. Preferably I would configure separate host names for WAN

Re: [pfSense Support] openssh flaw

Nachricht- > Von: David Burgess [mailto:apt@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. Mai 2009 21:37 > An: support > Betreff: [pfSense Support] openssh flaw > > http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/05/21/1824220&from=rss > > What versions run in pfsens

[pfSense Support] openssh flaw

http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/05/21/1824220&from=rss What versions run in pfsense? Is this something we should be concerned about? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e

Re: [pfSense Support] wrong boot device after generic install

On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Chris Buechler wrote: > Just edit it with vi and exit with :x! to override the ro. Very good. Thanks. db - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mai

[pfSense Support] wrong boot device after generic install

Hi all, I'm new to pfsense and a real novice with FreeBSD, so go easy on me ;) I used the live CD of pfsense 1.2.3-RC1 to install to a hard drive for use in a soekris net5501. When I boot while attached to the serial console it appears that it can't find the root filesystem, and I'm left with som

<    1   2   3