Sawadeekap.
Might be interesting for some people here.
(I translated the subject to english)
Yours,
Fabian.
Original-Nachricht
Betreff: Re: [swinog] Achtung: moegliche (Mail) Probleme durch
Aenderung der Nameserver fuer .in-addr.arpa !
Datum: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 14:13:35 +0200
Sawadeekap
Is it possible to connect a serial DCF or GPS clock to a pfSense box, or
are the drivers missing in the OpenNTP package? Is it possible to set
the parameters "manually" in a config File?
Thanks for this great project and looking forward to RC1 :)
Fabian
--
Sawadeekap
Is there a guide, other than
http://www.xaero.org/index.php/archive/tag/pfsense/ , to get IPv6 on the
LAN side over 6to4, STF?
Thanks,
Fabian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additio
Ciao
Could it be that the latest TFTP Package isn't working with the latest
2.0 Beta4 "firmare"?
Greetings,
Fabian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfse
Hello
Is the stf (6to4) interface option disabled in the latest 2.0 BETA
Kernel? Is it possible to create a stf interface or enable at least the
option in the next Image?
--
# ifconfig stf create
ifconfig: SIOCIFCREATE2: Invalid argument
--
Thanks,
Fabian
--
Am 01.08.2010 22:01, schrieb Chris Buechler:
You're using polling, so that's to be expected.
Thanks for hte hint!
fabiana
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Am 01.08.2010 02:02, schrieb Chris Buechler:
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Fabian Abplanalp
wrote:
Am 31.07.2010 22:52, schrieb Chris Buechler:
Maybe. Maybe not. Impossible to say based on your description, system
is what's using the CPU, so if you're pushing a decent amount
Am 31.07.2010 22:52, schrieb Chris Buechler:
Maybe. Maybe not. Impossible to say based on your description, system
is what's using the CPU, so if you're pushing a decent amount of
traffic then yeah it's probably normal.
Current traffic is low (WAN in 56Kbps/out 700kbps)... Even with "no"
traffi
Sawadeekap
I'm running pfSense 2.0 BETA4 on a Supermicro ATOM Barebone (5010A-PHF).
Everything works more or less as expected, except I see always a CPU
usage of 25% (Dualcore with HT) in the GUI.
Is that ok?
Thanks,
Fabian
top on shell says:
last pid: 51666; load averages: 1.08, 1.03,
Hi Mailinglist
Just a small comment about the Plugins:
spamd and sipproxy are some "musts" for many of my installations, but
the current state of those are very bad.
Usually I have to reboot the pfSense box to get a stable SIP connection,
and also SPAMD doesn't work as espected ("useless" butto
On 1/10/10 3:32 AM, David Newman wrote:
On 1/9/10 5:40 PM, Tortise wrote:
I thought a managed switch was a pre-requisite for VLAN's, as is one
pfSense box (or equivalent).
All switches here are managed.
Not necessarily. At least one box that can forward traffic among VLANs
is the on
Sawadeekap
Question... I have currently a LAN with 2 VLANs (default and VLAN99 for
a guest WLAN). Default uses pfSense with portforwarding etc., the VLAN99
uses a separate pfSense ALIX with its own LAN Subnet and WAN address.
Would it be possible to run all this on the same pfSense box?
Setu
On 12/15/09 1:03 AM, zhushazang wrote:
Em 14-12-2009 21:55, zhushazang escreveu:
Sorry guy, i need advise u about a this change in permission.
I really don't know if a process like that with root permitions are
secure.
Then, think better before make this change in your system.
att
Yes, s
Sawadeekap
After a failed upgrade from 1.2.2 to 1.2.3, I made a fresh install from
pfSense Full, installed SpamD Package, but it didn't forward any Mails
to the internal Exchange Server.
I used the default settings from the package, added my internal exchange
server (172.22.1.x), and some blac
Scott Ullrich wrote:
I'm trying to setup pfSense with SpamD (Greylisting and tarpit). In the
first setup with the "real" Mailserver behind the NAT it works perfectly,
but if I setup the forwarding to a server with a "public" IP no mails are
forwarded. Are there any limitations?
Yeah, I don
Hi
I'm trying to setup pfSense with SpamD (Greylisting and tarpit). In the
first setup with the "real" Mailserver behind the NAT it works
perfectly, but if I setup the forwarding to a server with a "public" IP
no mails are forwarded. Are there any limitations?
Thanks,
Fabian
---
Hi Jeremy
I had such problems once with a "wrong" MTU set in pfSense... Some sites
did work, others not...
Greetings,
Fabian
So there is one website which I know to be up and working that I am
trying to access. When I am behind my pfsense/Alix 2c3, it does not
work (will not load in a browse
17 matches
Mail list logo