Re: [pfSense Support] DynDns scheduling issues

2005-12-20 Thread Kevin Wolf
That first file only has the character ':' in it. # cat /cf/conf/dyndns.cache : I dunno if cat is the right command to use though. I'm a noob to *BSD =) The second file has a lot of stuff in it. # cat /var/etc/dyndns.debug 10-31-05 06:01:01 - (1183040) - [dyndns] -

[pfSense Support] Traffic Graph

2005-12-04 Thread Kevin Wolf
How come the traffic graph doesn't work right in Firefox 1.5? Is there any way I can make it work? I don't like having to load IE to view them. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic Graph

2005-12-04 Thread Kevin Wolf
Oh, I was still running .95a. Thanks! Scott Ullrich wrote: Upgrade to 0.95.4 On 12/4/05, Kevin Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How come the traffic graph doesn't work right in Firefox 1.5? Is there any way I can make it work? I don't like having to load IE to view them

Re: AW: [pfSense Support] Traffic Shaper Presets

2005-11-25 Thread Kevin Wolf
not running low on bandwidth use 128 kbit/s for the queue. Holger -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Kevin Wolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Freitag, 25. November 2005 08:47 An: support@pfsense.com Betreff: Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic Shaper Presets Cool, sounds good, and thanks

Re: AW: [pfSense Support] Traffic Shaper Presets

2005-11-25 Thread Kevin Wolf
spot to reclaim some of the bandwidth. Also, HFSC uses bandwidth for shaping is as well but I cannot recall how much it allocates/uses. Scott On 11/25/05, Kevin Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I occassionally use Skype, not often enough to be a problem though. You're correct, only one phone

Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic Shaper Presets

2005-11-24 Thread Kevin Wolf
during a firmware update, which momentarily would kill the internet. Thanks again, Kevin W. Bill Marquette wrote: This would be your lucky day ;) On 11/23/05, Kevin Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just a few comments... first off, the rules for Shareaza and Gnutella seem to be identical

[pfSense Support] Traffic Shaper Presets

2005-11-23 Thread Kevin Wolf
Just a few comments... first off, the rules for Shareaza and Gnutella seem to be identical, so you might choose to either remove Shareaza, or rename it to Gnutella 2- and have it shape TCP as well as UDP packets on 6346 since G2 uses both protocols, instead of only TCP (which would be

Re: [pfSense Support] WAN DHCP not working ?

2005-11-13 Thread Kevin Wolf
I have cable, so this advice *might* not apply to you, but you can try it anyway. Sometimes the modem won't sync up to a different device (MAC address) unless you reboot it. So try rebooting the DSL modem first if you haven't already. If that doesn't work, try cloning the MAC address from

Re: [pfSense Support] 0.89.2

2005-10-24 Thread Kevin Wolf
Bill Marquette wrote: On 10/23/05, Kevin Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can tell the port that I'm getting all the traffic on is not 7700. This means that the port that I'm sending on through the WAN is not 7700 like it should be according to the rule I made. I even doublechecked

Re: [pfSense Support] 0.89.2

2005-10-24 Thread Kevin Wolf
Bill Marquette wrote: On 10/23/05, Kevin Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can tell the port that I'm getting all the traffic on is not 7700. This means that the port that I'm sending on through the WAN is not 7700 like it should be according to the rule I made. I even doublechecked

Re: [pfSense Support] 0.89.2

2005-10-24 Thread Kevin Wolf
Bill Marquette wrote: On 10/24/05, Kevin Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't find my 0.86.4 cd, and it's not on the mirrors :( Does anyone have a link where I can download it at? Here's what cat /tmp/rules.debug | grep 700 looks like from my 0.89.2 setup: # cat /tmp/rules.debug | grep

Re: [pfSense Support] 0.89.2

2005-10-23 Thread Kevin Wolf
Bill Marquette wrote: On 10/23/05, Kevin Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And, outbound NAT rules still don't seem to be working. I set the rule up with the same settings I had in 0.86.4, moved the rule above the default rule, applied, made a normal port forwarding rule / firewall entry

Re: [pfSense Support] 0.89.2

2005-10-23 Thread Kevin Wolf
Bill Marquette wrote: On 10/23/05, Kevin Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And, outbound NAT rules still don't seem to be working. I set the rule up with the same settings I had in 0.86.4, moved the rule above the default rule, applied, made a normal port forwarding rule / firewall entry

[pfSense Support] 0.87 Installer

2005-10-19 Thread Kevin Wolf
Well, you said you wanted feedback on how well the installer figures out the disk geometry so here goes. I burned my 0.87 iso to a cd and loaded the installer. The geometry it showed this time is way different than what is currently in my bios (this time it didn't use the numbers my BIOS

[pfSense Support] Re: 0.87 Installer

2005-10-19 Thread Kevin Wolf
Kevin Wolf wrote: Well, you said you wanted feedback on how well the installer figures out the disk geometry so here goes. I burned my 0.87 iso to a cd and loaded the installer. The geometry it showed this time is way different than what is currently in my bios (this time it didn't use

Re: [pfSense Support] 0.87 Installer

2005-10-19 Thread Kevin Wolf
Scott Ullrich wrote: Thanks for the very detailed feedback! We will take another look to find out why it's not using the values you inputted. Scott On 10/19/05, Kevin Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, you said you wanted feedback on how well the installer figures out the disk geometry

[pfSense Support] UDP consistent translation

2005-10-12 Thread Kevin Wolf
It seems my problems playing GunZ are related to the fact that pfSense doesn't seem to do UDP consistent translation... is there any way around this, a hidden option somewhere? I tested with the tool from this site: http://midcom-p2p.sourceforge.net/ If I enable 1:1, GunZ works, and UDP

Re: [pfSense Support] UDP consistent translation

2005-10-12 Thread Kevin Wolf
I'm sorry, your solution actually worked. I forgot to move the new rule above the default, so it had priority! D'oh!!! Thank you for the help, it was much appreciated :) Sincerely, Kevin W. Bill Marquette wrote: On 10/12/05, Kevin Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems my problems