Thanks! Please try 0.88 if you can. The regressions you mentioned
are now hopefully corrected.
On 10/19/05, Kevin Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scott Ullrich wrote:
>
> >Thanks for the very detailed feedback! We will take another look to
> >find out why it's not using the values you input
Scott Ullrich wrote:
Thanks for the very detailed feedback! We will take another look to
find out why it's not using the values you inputted.
Scott
On 10/19/05, Kevin Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, you said you wanted feedback on how well the installer figures out
the disk geometr
Thanks for the very detailed feedback! We will take another look to
find out why it's not using the values you inputted.
Scott
On 10/19/05, Kevin Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, you said you wanted feedback on how well the installer figures out
> the disk geometry so here goes. I burne
Well, you said you wanted feedback on how well the installer figures out
the disk geometry so here goes. I burned my 0.87 iso to a cd and loaded
the installer. The geometry it showed this time is way different than
what is currently in my bios (this time it didn't use the numbers my
BIOS sent
That was the name before I gzipped it. It's correct and I will fix it.
On 10/18/05, David Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I noticed that when you upzip the current 0.87 ISO
> image that it unzips to an image called
> FreeBSIE.iso ... is that correct or is that a new
> naming convention? I a
I noticed that when you upzip the current 0.87 ISO
image that it unzips to an image called
FreeBSIE.iso ... is that correct or is that a new
naming convention? I am use to seeing the ISOs
named "pfSense-LiveCD-ver.iso"
Please forgive my ignorance.
--
David L. Strout
Engineering Systems Plus, LLC
