RE: [pfSense Support] Accessing NATed services from behind the NAT

2005-08-26 Thread Dimitri Rodis
to _understand_ why. WHY WHY WHY?!?!? :) Dimitri Rodis Integrita Systems LLC -Original Message- From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 11:18 PM Cc: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Accessing NATed services from behind the NAT On 8/26/05

RE: [pfSense Support] Accessing NATed services from behind the NAT

2005-08-26 Thread alan walters
of your problem you sort it out. -Original Message- From: Dimitri Rodis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26 August 2005 08:50 To: Chris Buechler Cc: support@pfsense.com Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Accessing NATed services from behind the NAT I'm not sure I follow what you mean by Put

Re: [pfSense Support] Accessing NATed services from behind the NAT

2005-08-25 Thread Dan Swartzendruber
At 09:20 PM 8/25/2005, Dimitri Rodis wrote: Does this issue still exist in the latest build of pfSense? Better explanation: http://www.m0n0.ch/wall/docbook/faq-lannat.html I *hate* the split horizon or split brain DNS solution. It is an absolute nightmare to do this stuf in DNS. Please tell

Re: [pfSense Support] Accessing NATed services from behind the NAT

2005-08-25 Thread Chris Buechler
On 8/25/05, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please show an example if this is possible... From what I understand the problem still exists. sounds like it works on 1:1, but I do believe it's still an issue for inbound and server NAT, or whatever we call it now. People throw such