to _understand_ why.
WHY WHY WHY?!?!? :)
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 11:18 PM
Cc: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Accessing NATed services from behind the
NAT
On 8/26/05
of your problem you sort it out.
-Original Message-
From: Dimitri Rodis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 August 2005 08:50
To: Chris Buechler
Cc: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Accessing NATed services from behind the
NAT
I'm not sure I follow what you mean by Put
At 09:20 PM 8/25/2005, Dimitri Rodis wrote:
Does this issue
still exist in the latest build of pfSense?
Better explanation:
http://www.m0n0.ch/wall/docbook/faq-lannat.html
I *hate* the split horizon or split
brain DNS solution. It is an absolute nightmare to do this stuf in
DNS. Please tell
On 8/25/05, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please show an example if this is possible...
From what I understand the problem still exists.
sounds like it works on 1:1, but I do believe it's still an issue for
inbound and server NAT, or whatever we call it now.
People throw such