I run an RFC LAN, with two NIC interfaces - one being the public
interface that connects to Comcast.
FreeBSD NATD runs on the external interface. As of FreeBSD-6, it can
be told to run off the internal one. I don't really know if there's any
benefit to that, though.
Most of these issues h
Forrest Aldrich wrote:
Oops sorry about that. ;-)
I was using Intel 10/100 cards (dual port). I also had Kensingtons.
It could also be due to other factors, such as my running FreeBSD's
natd. But, I did notice that SMB file browsing was much more fast
when I updated to the new machine.
In fact, I wonder if this old AP200 (Compaq) will boot of a CD!I'll
find out tomorrow! ;-)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oops sorry about that. ;-)
I was using Intel 10/100 cards (dual port). I also had Kensingtons.
It could also be due to other factors, such as my running FreeBSD's
natd. But, I did notice that SMB file browsing was much more fast
when I updated to the new machine.
My net connection is cabl
On 10/28/05, Forrest Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have an old Compaq AP200 (500mhz, maybe 512mb RAM). I think this
> would be sufficient for the firewall.
>
> I admit to some ignorance here.
>
> In the past, I had this old Dell that was 400mhz. Network throughput
> was slower (FreeBSD-
I have an old Compaq AP200 (500mhz, maybe 512mb RAM). I think this
would be sufficient for the firewall.
I admit to some ignorance here.
In the past, I had this old Dell that was 400mhz. Network throughput
was slower (FreeBSD-4.x). When I put it onto a 2.8ghz box, I noticed a
huge improve
