Re: [pfSense Support] Is your embedded pfsense stable?

2009-12-07 Thread Paul Mansfield
On 06/12/09 07:21, mehma sarja wrote: > 64GB SSD is under a hundred bucks now and it seems a fanless REGULAR > system (Atom 323) is do-able which should make for an awesome pfsense > application. Any Atom smashers out there? see mail archives, there was a flurry of discussion about ita few months

Re: [pfSense Support] Is your embedded pfsense stable?

2009-12-06 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 11:21:26PM -0800, mehma sarja wrote: > 64GB SSD is under a hundred bucks now and it seems a fanless REGULAR system > (Atom 323) is do-able which should make for an awesome pfsense application. > Any Atom smashers out there? I'm testing my Supermicro Atom box (see archive fo

Re: [pfSense Support] Is your embedded pfsense stable?

2009-12-05 Thread mehma sarja
64GB SSD is under a hundred bucks now and it seems a fanless REGULAR system (Atom 323) is do-able which should make for an awesome pfsense application. Any Atom smashers out there? Mehma ===

Re: [pfSense Support] Is your embedded pfsense stable?

2009-12-05 Thread Chris Buechler
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Eugen Leitl wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 09:47:30PM -0500, Chris Buechler wrote: > >> Even Snort with a lighter config is probably doable. But yeah if you >> push it past its limits, which isn't hard to do when you're running >> Snort, you can easily kill the bo

Re: [pfSense Support] Is your embedded pfsense stable?

2009-12-05 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 09:47:30PM -0500, Chris Buechler wrote: > Even Snort with a lighter config is probably doable. But yeah if you > push it past its limits, which isn't hard to do when you're running > Snort, you can easily kill the box. There is no swap, so when you run > out of RAM, things

Re: [pfSense Support] Is your embedded pfsense stable?

2009-12-04 Thread Chris Buechler
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 1:35 AM, mehma sarja wrote: > 1.2.3-RC3, nanobsd on a Netgate Alix board with 256 MB RAM and a 8GB CF > card. The firmware and all have been updated. > > Have been playing around with this box as a firewall for the last couple of > weeks. Then I did the unthinkable and ventu

Re: [pfSense Support] Is your embedded pfsense stable?

2009-12-03 Thread mehma sarja
This begs the question what can snort be run on? As I experienced, the pig fended off 2 intrusions - something in the porn arena - during the first few hours. That's pretty useful.

Re: [pfSense Support] Is your embedded pfsense stable?

2009-12-03 Thread Vick Khera
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 1:35 AM, mehma sarja wrote: > 1.2.3-RC3, nanobsd on a Netgate Alix board with 256 MB RAM and a 8GB CF > card. The firmware and all have been updated. I installed on a WRAP 2-ethernet system at my home the Nov 3 snapshot on Nov 3. I applied the boot sector patch as outlined

RE: [pfSense Support] Is your embedded pfsense stable?

2009-12-03 Thread Sean Cavanaugh
>Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 22:35:39 -0800 >From: mehmasa...@gmail.com >To: support@pfsense.com >Subject: [pfSense Support] Is your embedded pfsense stable? > >1.2.3-RC3, nanobsd on a Netgate Alix board with 256 MB RAM and a 8GB CF card. >The firmware and all have been>update

[pfSense Support] Is your embedded pfsense stable?

2009-12-02 Thread mehma sarja
*1.2.3-RC3, nanobsd on a Netgate Alix board with 256 MB RAM and a 8GB CF card. The firmware and all have been updated. Have been playing around with this box as a firewall for the last couple of weeks. Then I did the unthinkable and ventured out of my comfort shell. Installed DNS Blacklist, Snort