Adam Thompson
Chief Technical Architect, C3A Inc.
athom...@c3a.ca
(204) 272-9628 / fax: (204) 272-8291
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Buechler [mailto:cbuech...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 2:38 PM
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Laurentiu STEFAN
wrote:
> OKa. I have seen
> I have 2 connextion 30-100mbps so I need no less than 1.0 GHz CPU
>
Yeah that's reasonable, to ensure you aren't going to overload the system.
-
T
OKa. I have seen
I have 2 connextion 30-100mbps so I need no less than 1.0 GHz CPU
2010/7/14 Jim Pingle
> On 7/14/2010 3:17 PM, Laurentiu STEFAN wrote:
> > It's OKa to use an IBM Pentium MMX 200MHZ, 64MB Ram, 3GB SCSI, 3X LAN
> > for pfSense (Mask, firewall & load balancing whith 10 PC behin
On 7/14/2010 3:17 PM, Laurentiu STEFAN wrote:
> It's OKa to use an IBM Pentium MMX 200MHZ, 64MB Ram, 3GB SCSI, 3X LAN
> for pfSense (Mask, firewall & load balancing whith 10 PC behind)?
That's not very much RAM. If it doesn't use any packages, and no VPNs,
it might work. Barely.
But it will proba
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Laurentiu STEFAN
wrote:
> It's OKa to use an IBM Pentium MMX 200MHZ, 64MB Ram, 3GB SCSI, 3X LAN for
> pfSense (Mask, firewall & load balancing whith 10 PC behind)?
That CPU should be good for ~15mbps throughput if you're not loading
it with vpn and such. You will
It's OKa to use an IBM Pentium MMX 200MHZ, 64MB Ram, 3GB SCSI, 3X LAN for
pfSense (Mask, firewall & load balancing whith 10 PC behind)?
