[pfSense Support] NIC issues

2005-09-29 Thread J B
I'm having issues with the following NIC cards: Sun Quad Fast Ethernet - not recognized Intel Pro 100 - recognized, but doesn't seem to work - used it as my LAN interface - connected it back to back with another maching using a X-over cable and configured both on the same net - couldn't access

Re: [pfSense Support] NIC issues

2005-09-29 Thread Marc A. Volovic
Quoth J B: I'm having issues with the following NIC cards: Intel Pro 100 - recognized, but doesn't seem to work - used it as my LAN Am currently using a PRO 100 on a Routerboard 230. pfSense 81.4, currently. interface - connected it back to back with another maching using a X-over cable

Re: [pfSense Support] NIC issues

2005-09-29 Thread J B
the freebsd device name is hme: The hme(4) driver supports the on-board Ethernet interfaces of many Sun UltraSPARC workstation and server models. Cards supported by the hme(4) driver include: * Sun PCI SunSwift Adapter * Sun SBus SunSwift Adapter .( hme. and .SUNW,hme.) *

Re: [pfSense Support] NIC issues

2005-09-29 Thread Marc A. Volovic
Quoth J B: As for the Intel Pro - different system - that system I was using 1 Intel Pro 100 (stand alone), 1 Linksys Fast eth (shows up as dc0) and a 3com 3c509 In my case, the device name is fxp -- ---MAV Marc A. Volovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] Swiftouch,

Re: [pfSense Support] NIC issues

2005-09-29 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 9/29/05, J B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the freebsd device name is hme: I have added device hme and the kernel is currently compiling. Unless it errors out expect to see this in the next version. Scott - To unsubscribe,

Re: [pfSense Support] NIC issues

2005-09-29 Thread J B
yes - it shows up as fxp0 - but then I get errors loading microcode - and it just don't work on the network JB On Thu, September 29, 2005 12:38 pm, Marc A. Volovic wrote: Quoth J B: As for the Intel Pro - different system - that system I was using 1 Intel Pro 100 (stand alone), 1 Linksys

Re: [pfSense Support] NIC issues

2005-09-29 Thread Dan Swartzendruber
At 01:12 PM 9/29/2005, you wrote: Well - it keeps timing out, I wish I had the machine in front of me so I could send the actual error - but it keeps saying that the microcoad load is timing out sounds like the nic is flaky. i'm running the same NIC on my pfsense (as the LAN) and it works

Re: [pfSense Support] NIC issues

2005-09-29 Thread Scott Ullrich
I suspect the microcode is borking the NIC.Do you have a newer NIC that you could try? I would rather not remove the microcode support as it works wonders for newer cards. Scott On 9/29/05, J B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well - it keeps timing out, I wish I had the machine in front of me

Re: [pfSense Support] NIC issues

2005-09-29 Thread J B
Is there anyway to turn off the microcode on a per/NIC basis? I only have older Pro100 cards - (trying to recycle some old equipment and make it usefull again) JB On Thu, September 29, 2005 1:14 pm, Scott Ullrich wrote: I suspect the microcode is borking the NIC.Do you have a newer NIC

Re: [pfSense Support] NIC issues

2005-09-29 Thread Scott Ullrich
Not easily. The code detects that you have a fxp driver and then tries to init the code. I suppose we could add a tag to systemdo_not_use_nic_microcode or something... On 9/29/05, J B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there anyway to turn off the microcode on a per/NIC basis? I only have older

Re: [pfSense Support] NIC issues

2005-09-29 Thread Scott Ullrich
Okay, try the newest /etc/inc/pfsense-utils.inc and add this tag to system do_not_use_nic_microcode/ Scott On 9/29/05, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not easily. The code detects that you have a fxp driver and then tries to init the code. I suppose we could add a tag to

Re: [pfSense Support] NIC issues

2005-09-29 Thread Scott Ullrich
No, it was missing a ] Thanks for the heads up! On 9/29/05, Dan Swartzendruber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 01:31 PM 9/29/2005, you wrote: Okay, try the newest /etc/inc/pfsense-utils.inc and add this tag to system do_not_use_nic_microcode/ syntax error in your change. the ')' should be a

Re: [pfSense Support] NIC issues

2005-09-29 Thread Chris Buechler
Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) wrote: 3c509 or 3c905? The 509 is an ISA card which means you need to run the 3com util 3c5x9cfg (I think that's what its called) to make sure you don't have any irq/io conflicts. might have jumpers on the card in lieu of that, a few of them did. Might also

Re: [pfSense Support] NIC issues

2005-09-29 Thread J B
The issue is the Intel Pro - not the 3C509 (I have to use this until the QFE card is supported - because I only have 3 pci slots, and need 4 interfaces) The 3C509 is an ISA card - and works just fine JB On Thu, September 29, 2005 3:49 pm, Chris Buechler wrote: Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) wrote:

Re: [pfSense Support] NIC issues

2005-09-29 Thread Big Wave Dave
On 9/29/05, J B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The issue is the Intel Pro - not the 3C509 (I have to use this until theQFE card is supported - because I only have 3 pci slots, and need 4interfaces) The 3C509 is an ISA card - and works just fineJB Which QFE card is not supported? Dave--

RE: [pfSense Support] NIC issues

2005-09-29 Thread Fleming, John \(ZeroChaos\)
So what irqs are the 3com and Intel on? -Original Message- From: J B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 2:53 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] NIC issues The issue is the Intel Pro - not the 3C509 (I have to use this until the QFE card

RE: [pfSense Support] NIC issues

2005-09-29 Thread Fleming, John \(ZeroChaos\)
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] NIC issues Is there anyway to turn off the microcode on a per/NIC basis? I only have older Pro100 cards - (trying to recycle some old equipment and make it usefull again) JB On Thu, September 29, 2005 1:14 pm, Scott Ullrich wrote: I suspect the microcode is borking