Re: [pfSense Support] New blocked traffic

2010-06-09 Thread Jim Pingle
On 6/9/2010 9:35 AM, Lyle Giese wrote: >> On 2.0 the pf logs are split into two lines. You need the line after >> this to see the remainder of the log info. >> >> > That bytes! How does a simple syslog parser handle that to match the > two lines together? How can you guarentee that the next li

Re: [pfSense Support] New blocked traffic

2010-06-09 Thread Lyle Giese
Jim Pingle wrote: >> I have another soekris running 2.0-BETA2 and seeing the following in the >> logs from it(it's not logging source or destination). Be nice to have >> the source ip address... >> >> Lyle Giese >> LCR Computer Services, Inc. >> >> Jun 8 21:47:21 proxy pf: 00:00:00.000350 rule 2/

Re: [pfSense Support] New blocked traffic

2010-06-09 Thread Jim Pingle
> I have another soekris running 2.0-BETA2 and seeing the following in the > logs from it(it's not logging source or destination). Be nice to have > the source ip address... > > Lyle Giese > LCR Computer Services, Inc. > > Jun 8 21:47:21 proxy pf: 00:00:00.000350 rule 2/0(match): block in on si

Re: [pfSense Support] New blocked traffic

2010-06-09 Thread Lyle Giese
Lyle Giese wrote: > I am seeing alot of the messages below. Is this any thing special I need to > watch out for? These seemed to start recently and just want to see if this > is something new or ??? > > I like to know what I am up against when I see increases in certain traffic > and googling

[pfSense Support] New blocked traffic

2010-06-09 Thread Lyle Giese
I am seeing alot of the messages below. Is this any thing special I need to watch out for? These seemed to start recently and just want to see if this is something new or ??? I like to know what I am up against when I see increases in certain traffic and googling this(I may not know what to l