Re: [pfSense Support] Re: Can't get more than 10k connections on an IP

2010-09-02 Thread Chris Buechler
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Tom tom.val...@gmail.com wrote: worked great.. one firewall is 1.2.3 and it was exactly as you mentioned. the other firewall is 1.2.2 and there is no set skip on pfsync line but I added it in the same section before the $rules .= \n; touched a rule to force

[pfSense Support] Re: Can't get more than 10k connections on an IP

2010-08-30 Thread Tom
I forgot to mention than when this happens, I can still connect to other IPs on the same firewall so it seems to be a per IP limit. On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Tom tom.val...@gmail.com wrote: We are running pfSense v: *1.2.2 *and running ejabberd and we are unable to have more than 10K

[pfSense Support] Re: Can't get more than 10k connections on an IP

2010-08-30 Thread Tom
pfsrctrpl seems to translate to src-nodes # pfctl -sm stateshard limit 20 src-nodes hard limit1 frags hard limit 5000 tableshard limit 1000 table-entries hard limit 10 I can change the src-nodes limit by editing pf.cfg with the following

Re: [pfSense Support] Re: Can't get more than 10k connections on an IP

2010-08-30 Thread Chris Buechler
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Tom tom.val...@gmail.com wrote: pfsrctrpl seems to translate to src-nodes Edit /etc/inc/filter.inc, find these two lines: $rules .= \n; $rules .= set skip on pfsync0\n; above those, add: $rules .= set limit src-nodes 23456\n; or

Re: [pfSense Support] Re: Can't get more than 10k connections on an IP

2010-08-30 Thread Tom
worked great.. one firewall is 1.2.3 and it was exactly as you mentioned. the other firewall is 1.2.2 and there is no set skip on pfsync line but I added it in the same section before the $rules .= \n; touched a rule to force the firewall reload and the numbers show up as expected. # pfctl -sm