nse box, other
>>> than
>>> it's a bridge, so it's hard to really tell what's wrong.
>>>
>>> Christopher Iarocci
>>> Network Solutions Manager
>>> Twin Forks Office Products
>>> 631-727-3354
>>>
>>>
&g
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 10:13 PM, Glenn Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings
>
> I have a transparent firewall running - (finally)however the only thing not
> working behind the firewall is dns resolution for servers behind the system
> doing a lookup.
> This caused all types of issues w/
Greetings
I have a transparent firewall running - (finally)however the only
thing not working behind the firewall is dns resolution for servers
behind the system doing a lookup.
This caused all types of issues w/ mail etc.
any suggestions ?
Glenn
rules for port 53 are set.
glenn
-
day, September 09, 2008 10:06 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] Transparent Firewall
Greetings folks -
After a really nice long google search I ended up here ...
In short we have a number of ip's a client of ours is looking to
setup
PFSense as a transparent bridg
stopher Iarocci
Network Solutions Manager
Twin Forks Office Products
631-727-3354
-Original Message-
From: Glenn Kelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 10:06 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] Transparent Firewall
Greetings folks -
After a really
I used the docs at http://pfsense.trendchiller.com/transparent_firewall.pdf
I have a very similar setup in 5 locations
Pc
Tim Nelson wrote:
I'm successfully using pfSense in quite a few instances as transparent bridged
devices. They handle multiple-subnet bridging perfectly. I have found one
so it's hard to really tell what's wrong.
Christopher Iarocci
Network Solutions Manager
Twin Forks Office Products
631-727-3354
-Original Message-
From: Glenn Kelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 10:06 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSen
I'm successfully using pfSense in quite a few instances as transparent bridged
devices. They handle multiple-subnet bridging perfectly. I have found one
caveat is to put the WAN on your incoming provider (as you've done) and use an
OPT interface for the inside of the bridge. If I recall, there a
Greetings folks -
After a really nice long google search I ended up here ...
In short we have a number of ip's a client of ours is looking to setup
PFSense as a transparent bridge/firewall for.
Setup is as follows
Incoming Ethernet Connection from Data Center
On Thu, 07 Sep 2006 09:00:29 -0500, you wrote:
>allowed. The traffic shaper queues and rules will need to be setup manually.
I forgot to add that there are messages in the forums stating that traffic
shaping does not work on a bridge in pfsense release 1. I was not able to find
the entry in the
I have done the setup you describe on m0n0wall so it should work on pfsense
however I have not tested it. We used it to apply traffic shaping to an entire
subnet of servers while allowing the servers to bypass it if it failed.
As it ended up, m0n0wall running on an ancient P60 was more reliable t
Hello,
For the life of me, I just simply cannot get RC2 (or any other version
I've tried) to work as a transparent firewall.
Here is what I need to do (which I *believe* is very simple):
I have a /24 subnet routed to me by a T1 Provider. I want to put a
pfSense box in between the actual cisco ro
12 matches
Mail list logo
