Good afternoon all,
I am attempting to trunk with a Cisco switch and hanging off another
trunk port is a Cisco AP. The trunks (PF, Cisco AP and switch) all say
they are trunking but I cannot pass any traffic. I have rules in place.
The configuration is below. Anyone tried this on a PF? We h
I'm not using a 3550 but rather a 3560 switch and the only big difference
that I see is that you have VLAN 236 as your native (untagged) VLAN on that
interface. I would actually take that off and have all VLAN's be tagged to
PF. Otherwise PF will most likely try to talk on the untagged VLAN. You
What do you mean you can't pass traffic? You can't get ICMP off of a
wireless client, can't ping the VLAN interface, what?
When I hooked my 1230 directly up to my pfSense system, I couldn't
reach VLAN interfaces on the AP, I had to use BVIs. If I may ask, why
do you need a layer 3 interface on t
If you have the ability to tag on all VLAN's you might as well do it. The
only reason not to would be for devices that do not support VLAN tagging i.e.
Computer hooked up to a Phone and phone hooked up to the switch. In this
case, we have a device, pfsense, that has the ability to tag all traffic
Just for managment,
I wasn't able to ping from mgt int on ap to PF vlan int IP.
-W
-
Wade Blackwell
"Integrity is often more painful and always more profitable than
perception management"
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 21:03 -0700, RB wrote:
> What do you mean you can't pass traffic?
Thanks,
I will try these both today and see what love can be had.
-W
-
Wade Blackwell
"Integrity is often more painful and always more profitable than
perception management"
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 22:26 -0600, Curtis LaMasters wrote:
> If you have the ability to tag on all VLAN
