On 4/7/07, Diego Morato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The webGUI set this options right now, however after reboot this setting is
lost.
Thanks, should be fixed now.
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
The webGUI set this options right now, however after reboot this setting is
lost.
--
Diego
- Original Message -
From: Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@pfsense.com
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 1:30 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] bridged interface and arp: moved
-2007
built on Fri Mar 23 05:07:13 EDT 2007
--
Diego
- Original Message -
From: Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@pfsense.com
Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2007 12:20 AM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] bridged interface and arp: moved...
messages
On 3/31/07, Charles Sprickman [EMAIL
On 4/2/07, Diego Morato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott,
The Shared Physical Netork option is not setting
net.link.ether.inet.log_arp_movement in my box. I check and save, and unckek
and save, and this always stay in 1. I´m using sysctl -a to list the
onfigurations. It only print 1 - 0 at
Anyone? I can't think of any other info to include.
I know this is nowhere near as exciting as dual-wan and ipsec questions...
:)
C
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 1/31/07, Charles Sprickman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
is used
when you're overlapping multiple networks (inside + outside) on one nic.
Charles
--
Diego
- Original Message -
From: Charles Sprickman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@pfsense.com
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 9:27 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] bridged interface and arp
On 3/31/07, Diego Morato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are right Charles, shared physical network doesn´t apply here. Just for
complement, I installed pfsense in a remote office and I getting this same
problem. In my case this problem occur because I have a Windows Server using
two interfaces as
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007, Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 3/31/07, Diego Morato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are right Charles, shared physical network doesn´t apply here. Just for
complement, I installed pfsense in a remote office and I getting this same
problem. In my case this problem occur because I
On 3/31/07, Charles Sprickman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure that's going to help - I have no interfaces sharing the same
physical network, and the messages are from hosts on the bridged OPT1, not
from pfsense itself.
This suppresses that log mesasge.
In short, the pfsense box seems
I´ve checked the shared physical network option and I continue getting arp
messages from my team.
--
Diego
- Original Message -
From: Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@pfsense.com
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2007 7:14 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] bridged interface and arp
- 0
System:
1.0.1-SNAPSHOT-03-15-2007
built on Fri Mar 23 05:07:13 EDT 2007
--
Diego
- Original Message -
From: Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@pfsense.com
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2007 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] bridged interface and arp: moved...
messages
On 3/31/07, Charles Sprickman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007, Scott Ullrich wrote:
Just out of curiousity, what does this setting actually do? Does it move
the WAN IP to the bridge interface?
No, it sets sysctl -w net.link.ether.inet.log_arp_movement=0. -HEAD
has different code
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007, Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 3/31/07, Charles Sprickman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007, Scott Ullrich wrote:
Just out of curiousity, what does this setting actually do? Does it move
the WAN IP to the bridge interface?
No, it sets sysctl -w
On 3/31/07, Charles Sprickman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, but that's not going to affect other hosts, that's just for the
firewall itself, no?
Charles
That is correct.
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Did you tried to check the option 'Shared Physical Network' under System:
Advanced functions?
--
Diego
- Original Message -
From: Charles Sprickman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@pfsense.com
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 9:27 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] bridged interface and arp
overlapping multiple networks (inside + outside) on one nic.
Charles
--
Diego
- Original Message -
From: Charles Sprickman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@pfsense.com
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 9:27 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] bridged interface and arp: moved... messages
On Wed
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 1/31/07, Charles Sprickman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I'm running PFSense 1.0.1 with three interfaces: WAN, LAN and then OPT1
acting as a bridged interface with the WAN. Our DSL provider gives us a
/29 on the LAN port of their router and I
Hi all,
I'm running PFSense 1.0.1 with three interfaces: WAN, LAN and then OPT1
acting as a bridged interface with the WAN. Our DSL provider gives us a
/29 on the LAN port of their router and I use the first available IP for
the PFSense WAN IP (which is also used for NAT on the LAN) and the
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 1/31/07, Charles Sprickman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I'm running PFSense 1.0.1 with three interfaces: WAN, LAN and then OPT1
acting as a bridged interface with the WAN. Our DSL provider gives us a
/29 on the LAN port of their router and I
On 1/31/07, Charles Sprickman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Before I flip the switch, could you describe briefly what that will do?
It will simply silence all of the Host has moved from X to X messages
your seeing.
Will it solve the problem? No. Will it hide it? Yes. Will my
network
20 matches
Mail list logo
