On Dec 19, 2007 11:12 AM, Paul M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> now pfsense 1.2 full release is hopefully pretty much ready to roll, I
> was hoping I could place my vote on this as a really good feature to add
> for 1.3-rc1! I think it would add a valuable feature to pfsense future
> versions.
Scott Ullrich wrote:
> On Nov 22, 2007 5:29 AM, Paul M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> is there a port of haproxy (or equivalent) to run on pfsense, and if so
>> does it work reliably?
...
>> we previously used pound as a load balancer and it works well, but we
...
> On my TODO list is to convert us
On Nov 22, 2007 5:29 AM, Paul M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is there a port of haproxy (or equivalent) to run on pfsense, and if so
> does it work reliably?
Not at the moment.
> we previously used pound as a load balancer and it works well, but we
> need a load balancer which can do more than ju
is there a port of haproxy (or equivalent) to run on pfsense, and if so
does it work reliably?
we previously used pound as a load balancer and it works well, but we
need a load balancer which can do more than just detect that there's a
tcp listener, in case our web app stops working but still list
