RE: [pfSense Support] multipe remote desktop connections/nat

2008-10-09 Thread Alirio Yepes
server terminal access web. The user change port, for example I use XPU terminal Server. De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: MiƩrcoles, 08 de Octubre de 2008 02:29 p.m. Para: support@pfsense.com Asunto: [pfSense Support] multipe remote desktop connections

[pfSense Support] multipe remote desktop connections/nat

2008-10-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i need to allow multipe users with private static ip's to remote desktop to multiple machines behind pfsense. this pfsense box is on a private network(double nating). if i simply create a port forward rule only one machine will be accessible behind the pfsense box over port 3389. i want to map

Re: [pfSense Support] multipe remote desktop connections/nat

2008-10-08 Thread RB
so user A can connect to host A behind pfsense box via port 3389 and user B can connect to host B via port 3389 behind the pfsense firewall and so on and so forth. what should be my approach? Install a Terminal Services Gateway. pfSense does not do policy-NAT, i.e. port-forwarding based on

Re: [pfSense Support] multipe remote desktop connections/nat

2008-10-08 Thread BSD Wiz
Damn, I was afraid of that. -Phil G On Oct 8, 2008, at 2:36 PM, RB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: so user A can connect to host A behind pfsense box via port 3389 and user B can connect to host B via port 3389 behind the pfsense firewall and so on and so forth. what should be my approach?

Re: [pfSense Support] multipe remote desktop connections/nat

2008-10-08 Thread Michael Schuh
If you can use different ports your chances are good. say User A Connects to ExternalIP:3389 - forwarded to Host A:3389 say User B Connects to ExternalIP:13389 - forwarded to Host B:3389 Ist possible through the port-forward tab in NAT Rules cheers michael 2008/10/8 BSD Wiz [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [pfSense Support] multipe remote desktop connections/nat

2008-10-08 Thread BSD Wiz
That is the approach I will take. Thanks -Phil G On Oct 8, 2008, at 3:01 PM, Michael Schuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you can use different ports your chances are good. say User A Connects to ExternalIP:3389 - forwarded to Host A:3389 say User B Connects to ExternalIP:13389 -